首页> 外文期刊>WoodenBoat >The Problem With Dockage And Storage Fees
【24h】

The Problem With Dockage And Storage Fees

机译:码头费和仓储费问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the unfortunate problems with long,slender hulls is that almost the entire boating industry charges for boats based on length,rather than on their real size-their displacement.If only dockage and storage were calculated based on displacement in tons,not length in feet.Using tons,all of our normalized example boats from 45' to 67' LOA would pay the same storage fees.Instead-as things are-the much more economical longer,slender boats are penalized by paying higher storage due to their longer lengths.This is a real shame and something that the boating industry should address to encourage more efficient boats. Tons may be too abstract a number to be practical. After all,how is a yard to check on the tonnage figdre you supply them with? I've long proposed that dockage and storage be based on simply 3.5 times the beam.For our three example boats,this would give the bill-able dockage lengths shown in Table 6.
机译:长而细长的船体的不幸问题之一是,几乎整个划船业都是根据船长而不是船体的实际尺寸来收取费用的。如果仅根据吨位而不是船长来计算泊位和仓储量,使用吨,我们所有规格化的示例船(从45'到67'LOA)都将支付相同的仓储费。相反,事情变得更经济更长,因为细长的船体较长,因此需要支付更高的仓储费这是一种真正的耻辱,划船业应该解决这些问题,以鼓励提高效率的划船。吨可能太抽象而无法实用。毕竟,如何在院子里检查您提供给他们的吨位?长期以来,我一直建议停泊和存储应基于波束的3.5倍。对于我们的三个示例船,这将给出表6中所示的可计费停泊长度。

著录项

  • 来源
    《WoodenBoat》 |2009年第206期|p.86|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 水路运输;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号