...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The World Economy >Does private aid follow the flag? An empirical analysis of humanitarian assistance
【24h】

Does private aid follow the flag? An empirical analysis of humanitarian assistance

机译：私人援助是否遵循国旗？人道主义援助的实证分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper compares the allocation of private humanitarian aid to that of official humanitarian aid awarded to 140 recipient countries over the 2000-2016 period. We construct a new database that offers information on the country in which the headquarters of private donors are located to test whether private aid tends to follow the humanitarian aid allocation pattern of the respective official donor. Our empirical results confirm that private humanitarian aid tends to "follow the flag". This finding is robust against the inclusion of various fixed effects, estimating instrumental variables models and disaggregating private humanitarian aid into corporate aid and NGO aid. Donor country-specific estimations reveal that private humanitarian aid from China, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States tend to "follow the flag".
机译：本文比较了2000-2016期间授予了140个受援国的官方人道主义援助的私人人道主义援助。我们构建一个新的数据库，提供有关私人捐助者总部所在的国家的信息，以测试私人援助是否遵循相应官方捐赠者的人道主义援助分配模式。我们的经验结果证实，私人人道主义援助倾向于“遵循旗帜”。这一发现对包含各种固定效果的难以抵御，估算工具变量模型以及将私人人道主义援助分解为企业援助和非政府组织援助。捐助国特定的估计表明，来自中国，瑞典，英国和美国的私人人道援助倾向于“遵循旗帜”。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号