...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>World intellectual property report >Jurisdiction Issues in EU Cross-Border Online Copyright Infringement Cases
【24h】

Jurisdiction Issues in EU Cross-Border Online Copyright Infringement Cases

机译：欧盟跨境在线版权侵权案件中的管辖权问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Advocate General Niilo Jaaskinen has issued a non-binding opinion in Pinckney v. Mediatech on questions relating to jurisdiction in online cross-border copyright infringement cases. The French Supreme Court had asked the Court of Justice of the European Union to determine whether the courts of each member state from which the contents of a website were accessible, had jurisdiction to rule on alleged copyright infringement claims pursuant to Article 5(3), Brussels I Regulation. In his Opinion of June 13, 2013, AG Jaaskinen dismissed the "accessibility" criterion in favour of a "focus and target" approach already adopted by the CJEU in trade mark and database rights infringement cases.
机译：司法部长Niilo Jaaskinen在Pinckney诉Mediatech案中就在线跨境版权侵权案件的管辖权问题发表了非约束性意见。法国最高法院已要求欧洲联盟法院确定可从其访问网站内容的每个成员国的法院是否有管辖权，根据第5条第3款对涉嫌侵犯版权的诉讼做出裁决，布鲁塞尔一世条例。贾斯金（AG Jaaskinen）在2013年6月13日的意见中，驳回了“可访问性”标准，转而支持欧洲法院已经在商标和数据库权利侵权案件中采用的“重点和目标”方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号