首页> 外文期刊>World review of science, technology and sustainable development >The current status of the debate on socio-economic regulatory assessments: positions and policies in Canada, the USA, the EU and developing countries
【24h】

The current status of the debate on socio-economic regulatory assessments: positions and policies in Canada, the USA, the EU and developing countries

机译:社会经济法规评估辩论的现状:加拿大,美国,欧盟和发展中国家的立场和政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Article 26.1 of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety has the option of considering socio-economic issues in biosafety regulatory approval processes related to genetically engineered organisms. National laws and regulations in some countries have already defined positions and may have enacted policies dealing with socio-economic assessments. Many more countries, especially developing countries, are building their biosafety regulatory systems. This paper considers issues related to socio-economic assessments inclusion in biosafety processes by describing the current status and issues in Canada, USA, EU and selected developing countries. There is broad variation amongst examined countries in terms of inclusion modalities and guidance for assessment implementation. The need exists to define scope and if assessments are strictly socio-economic or expanded to include broader considerations such as ethical, religious, or cultural issues. Countries need to define clearly decision making rules and standards by which to render decisions as unclear procedures can lead to negative outcomes.
机译:《卡塔赫纳生物安全议定书》第26.1条可以选择在与基因工程生物有关的生物安全监管批准程序中考虑社会经济问题。一些国家的国家法律和法规已经确定了立场,并可能制定了有关社会经济评估的政策。许多国家,特别是发展中国家,正在建立其生物安全监管体系。本文通过描述加拿大,美国,欧盟和部分发展中国家的现状和问题,来考虑与将生物经济评估纳入社会经济评估有关的问题。在接受方式和评估实施指南方面,接受审查的国家之间存在很大差异。有必要定义范围,以及评估是否严格地从社会经济角度考虑或扩大到包括更广泛的考虑因素,例如伦理,宗教或文化问题。各国需要明确定义决策规则和标准,通过这些规则和标准来做出决策,因为程序不清晰会导致负面结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号