• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>World review of science, technology and sustainable development >Incinerator location conflict: How opponents try not to be the losers of the public decision making?
【24h】

Incinerator location conflict: How opponents try not to be the losers of the public decision making?

机译：焚化炉位置冲突：对手如何不成为公共决策的失败者？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The lack of monetary compensation and the difficulty for residents to exit close to an incinerator lead them to protest the construction of waste facilities. Opponents try to change undesirable locations to maintain their welfare. With a cost-benefit analysis, our incinerator location model attempts to measure both transportation and externality costs in comparable units. Two extreme behaviours are being tested: the maximisation of the distance from the facility to the residents' homes to avoid externality vs. the minimisation of distance from the households to the incinerator to reduce transportation costs. The aim of this article is to present the effects of opponents on the incinerator location and to propose an idea according to which conflict can change the distribution of resources in society.
机译：缺乏货币补偿以及居民难以靠近焚化炉的情况导致他们抗议建造废物设施。反对者试图改变不希望的位置以维持其福利。通过成本效益分析，我们的焚化炉选址模型尝试以可比单位衡量运输成本和外部成本。正在测试两种极端行为：从设施到居民住宅的距离最大化，以避免外部性；从家庭到焚化炉的距离最小，以降低运输成本。本文的目的是介绍对手对焚烧炉位置的影响，并提出一种想法，据此冲突可以改变社会中的资源分配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号