• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft >Why has regionalization failed in northern Sweden?
【24h】

Why has regionalization failed in northern Sweden?

机译：为什么瑞典北部的地区化失败了？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article examines and discusses how different theoretical perspectives from historical political economy may contribute to the understanding of why the regionalization attempt in northern Sweden has failed. Since cohesion and adaptation at the intermediate level of government has been a crucial factor behind successful regionalization in Sweden, the article focuses on the county council in Västernorrland. It is argued that the long-standing political differences and disputes between agents from different geographical areas within the county council in Västernorrland was one of the most important causes behind the failed regionalization attempt. In order to elucidate these disputes and thereby to increase the understanding of the failed regionalization process, this article deals with three different theoretical perspectives, which complement and interface with each other. The first perspective focuses on voters and elections and is broadly based on the rational choice political theory. The second perspective deals with the role of the bureaucracy and introduces theories related to governance and control. Finally, the third perspective discusses the role of historical institutions such as spatial policy.
机译：本文研究并讨论了与历史政治经济学不同的理论观点如何有助于理解为什么瑞典北部的区域化尝试失败了。由于政府中层的凝聚力和适应性是瑞典成功实现区域化的关键因素，因此本文重点介绍韦斯特诺兰郡的县议会。有人认为，韦斯特诺兰郡县议会内来自不同地理区域的特工之间长期以来的政治分歧和争执是造成区域化尝试失败的最重要原因之一。为了阐明这些纠纷，从而增加对失败的地区化进程的理解，本文讨论了三种不同的理论观点，它们相互补充并相互联系。第一个观点集中在选民和选举上，并且广泛地基于理性选择政治理论。第二种观点涉及官僚机构的作用，并介绍了与治理和控制有关的理论。最后，第三个角度讨论了历史制度（例如空间政策）的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号