首页> 外文学位 >Online and Face-to-Face Anatomy Dissection Labs: A Comparison of Levels of Achievement in Learning Outcomes and Perception of Learning and Satisfaction.
【24h】

Online and Face-to-Face Anatomy Dissection Labs: A Comparison of Levels of Achievement in Learning Outcomes and Perception of Learning and Satisfaction.

机译:在线和面对面解剖解剖实验室:学习成果的成就水平以及对学习和满意度的感知水平的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This quantitative study examined levels of achievement in learning outcomes when using a face-to-face dissection lab compared to an online dissection lab. Constructivist theory and Understanding by Design learning framework were at the core of this research study design. Data was collected from 24 health science students at a private Midwestern university during an anatomy course. Two assessment tools were utilized to examine the research questions. The first assessment tool was three exams and the second assessment tool was a cross-sectional personal assessment perception of learning and satisfaction survey. Data was collected on learning outcomes of the exams and results of the survey. Data analysis consisted of a one-way ANOVA with a post-hoc tukey on the learning outcomes of the exams and a series of Pearson correlation coefficients were used to analyze results of the personal assessment survey. Results of the three exams revealed there was significant differences between face-to-face learning and online learning, but the results did not favor one learning modality over the other. Instead, the results implied a multi-modal learning style is successful in learning anatomy. The results from the personal assessment survey indicated significant differences in the perception and satisfaction of online learning. However, the results were diverging as they implied there is still a need for face-to-face learning in anatomy, but there is also place for online cadavers in understanding and learning anatomy.
机译:与在线解剖实验室相比,这项定量研究检查了使用面对面解剖实验室时学习成果的成就水平。建构主义理论和“按设计理解”学习框架是本研究设计的核心。在解剖学课程中,数据是从中西部一所私立大学的24名健康科学学生那里收集的。使用了两种评估工具来检查研究问题。第一个评估工具是三门考试,第二个评估工具是对学习和满意度调查的横断面个人评估感知。收集了有关考试学习结果和调查结果的数据。数据分析由单向方差分析和事后学习测试的结果组成,并使用一系列皮尔森相关系数来分析个人评估调查的结果。这三项考试的结果表明,面对面学习和在线学习之间存在显着差异,但是结果并不偏向于一种学习方式。取而代之的是,结果暗示了一种多模式的学习方式可以成功地学习解剖学。个人评估调查的结果表明,在线学习的感知和满意度存在显着差异。但是,结果存在分歧,因为它们暗示着在解剖学上仍然需要面对面学习,但是在线尸体也有理解和学习解剖学的地方。

著录项

  • 作者

    Davidson, Jenna L.;

  • 作者单位

    College of Saint Mary.;

  • 授予单位 College of Saint Mary.;
  • 学科 Higher education.;Science education.;Education.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 162 p.
  • 总页数 162
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 航空、航天技术的研究与探索;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:54:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号