首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade >Reasonable or Unreasonable? The Evolution Analysis of the Chinese Administrative Examination & Approval System—Based on Statistical Analysis of Network News Keywords about Nine Typical Samples
【24h】

Reasonable or Unreasonable? The Evolution Analysis of the Chinese Administrative Examination & Approval System—Based on Statistical Analysis of Network News Keywords about Nine Typical Samples

机译:合理还是不合理?中国行政审批制度的演变分析-基于九个典型样本网络新闻关键词的统计分析

获取原文
       

摘要

A frequency analysis of network-news reports about nine samples of the Chinese Administrative Examination & Approval System reform, including Beijing, Tianjin, Gansu, Shanxi, Chengdu, Ningbo, Shanghai Pudong district, Chengdu Wuhou district and Guangdong Shunde district, was carried out. This research reveals that efficiency-oriented, government-led, top-down mandatory compliance style, incremental, insufficiency of civic engagement and social supervision etc. constitute the CAEAS reform, which has streamlined and downsized government functions, improved administrative efficiency and liberated the market. However, some contradictory phenomena, such as the efficiency paradox i.e. pursuit of efficiency and the efficiency trap, administrative route superior to the rule of law, administration separated from the government power-list, service-oriented but low level of public participation, government self-revolution and sector interests’ resistance, are intertwined to influence governance capability, although the threat of the middle-income trap emphasizes the necessity of good governance. The paper concludes that it is difficult to assess the CAEAS evolution simply by reasonable or unreasonable, comprehensive consideration is needed.
机译:对北京,天津,甘肃,山西,成都,宁波,上海浦东,成都武侯区和广东顺德等9个国家行政审批制度改革样本的网络新闻报道进行了频率分析。该研究表明,以效率为导向,政府主导,自上而下的强制性合规风格,增量,公民参与和社会监督不足等因素构成了CAEAS改革,简化和缩小了政府职能,提高了行政效率并解放了市场。 。但是,存在一些矛盾现象,例如效率悖论,即追求效率和效率陷阱,行政路径高于法治,行政与政府权力清单分离,服务导向但公众参与程度低,政府自我尽管中间收入陷阱的威胁强调了良好治理的必要性,但革命与部门利益的抵抗是相互交织在一起的,从而影响治理能力。本文的结论是,仅通过合理或不合理,全面的考虑就难以评估CAEAS的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号