...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Quantitative microbiological monitoring of hemodialysis fluids: evaluation of methods and demonstration of lack of test relevance in single-pass hemodialysis machines with automatic dialysate proportioning with reverse osmosis-treated tap water.
【24h】

Quantitative microbiological monitoring of hemodialysis fluids: evaluation of methods and demonstration of lack of test relevance in single-pass hemodialysis machines with automatic dialysate proportioning with reverse osmosis-treated tap water.

机译:血液透析液的微生物定量监测:方法的评估和缺乏通过透析液与反渗透处理过的自来水自动配比的单程血液透析机的测试相关性的证明。

获取原文
           

摘要

Two methods for estimating the quantity of microorganisms present in hemodialysis fluid, a blood agar surface-spread plate method and a total-count water tester device impregnated with modified standard plate count agar (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.), were evaluated. Both methods exhibited comparable precision; however, colony counts obtained with the total-count water tester were consistently and unacceptably low. The need for routine quantitative microbiological monitoring of hemodialysis fluids such as that recommended by the American Public Health Association was not supported by the results of this study. Such testing was not of value in predicting untoward reactions for patients undergoing hemodialysis, nor did quantitative testing of hemodialysis fluids identify the buildup of potentially hazardous levels of contamination within hemodialysis systems. Finally, the kinds of organisms found in hemodialysis systems, i.e., gram-negative water-borne bacilli, were elucidated.
机译:评估了两种估算血液透析液中微生物数量的方法:血琼脂表面铺板法和浸有改良标准板数琼脂的总计数水测试仪(Millipore Corp.,贝德福德,马萨诸塞州)。两种方法均显示出相当的精度。但是,用总计数水测试仪获得的菌落数始终是低得令人无法接受的。这项研究的结果不支持对血液透析液进行常规的定量微生物监测(如美国公共卫生协会建议的监测)。此类测试对于预测接受血液透析的患者的不良反应没有价值,对血液透析液的定量测试也无法确定血液透析系统中潜在危险污染物浓度的累积。最后,阐明了在血液透析系统中发现的生物种类,即革兰氏阴性水性细菌。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号