...
【24h】

REPLY

机译:回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It seems that the debate will persist until a well-controlled prospective study that includes a large number of multicentersamples is done. Nevertheless, the collective published experience with urethral realignment, together with our own, could answer certain frequently asked questions, such as, "Does en-doscopic realignment have an advantage over suprapubic cys-tostomy (SPC) alone in patients with severe urethral injuries?" The answer is yes; it decreases the incidence of delayed repair, and, by shortening the urethral gap, it seems logical to surmise that it could facilitate delayed repair. If it should fail, it does not delay, compromise, or preclude the use of SPC and delayed repair.
机译:似乎辩论将一直进行下去,直到进行了一项包括大量多中心样本的,受到良好控制的前瞻性研究。但是,集体发表的有关尿道再整形的经验以及我们自己的经验可以回答某些常见问题,例如:“对于严重的尿道损伤患者,内镜下整形比单纯耻骨上膀胱造瘘术(SPC)有优势吗? ”答案是肯定的。它减少了延迟修复的发生率,并且通过缩短尿道间隙,可以合理地推测它可以促进延迟修复。如果它应该失败,则不会延迟,损害或排除使用SPC和延迟维修。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号