首页> 外文期刊>Pure and Applied Geophysics >Seismic Hazard Assessment: Issues and Alternatives
【24h】

Seismic Hazard Assessment: Issues and Alternatives

机译:地震危险性评估:问题和替代方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Seismic hazard and risk are two very important concepts in engineering design and other policy considerations. Although seismic hazard and risk have often been used interchangeably, they are fundamentally different. Furthermore, seismic risk is more important in engineering design and other policy considerations. Seismic hazard assessment is an effort by earth scientists to quantify seismic hazard and its associated uncertainty in time and space and to provide seismic hazard estimates for seismic risk assessment and other applications. Although seismic hazard assessment is more a scientific issue, it deserves special attention because of its significant implication to society. Two approaches, probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) and deterministic seismic hazard analysis (DSHA), are commonly used for seismic hazard assessment. Although PSHA has been proclaimed as the best approach for seismic hazard assessment, it is scientifically flawed (i.e., the physics and mathematics that PSHA is based on are not valid). Use of PSHA could lead to either unsafe or overly conservative engineering design or public policy, each of which has dire consequences to society. On the other hand, DSHA is a viable approach for seismic hazard assessment even though it has been labeled as unreliable. The biggest drawback of DSHA is that the temporal characteristics (i.e., earthquake frequency of occurrence and the associated uncertainty) are often neglected. An alternative, seismic hazard analysis (SHA), utilizes earthquake science and statistics directly and provides a seismic hazard estimate that can be readily used for seismic risk assessment and other applications.
机译:地震危险性和风险是工程设计和其他政策考虑中的两个非常重要的概念。尽管地震危险性和风险经常可以互换使用,但是它们在本质上是不同的。此外,地震风险在工程设计和其他政策考虑中更为重要。地震危险性评估是地球科学家努力量化的地震危险性及其在时间和空间上的不确定性,并为地震危险性评估和其他应用提供地震危险性估计。尽管地震危险性评估更是一个科学问题,但由于其对社会的重大影响,因此值得特别关注。地震危险性评估通常使用两种方法,即概率地震危险性分析(PSHA)和确定性地震危险性分析(DSHA)。尽管PSHA被公认为是评估地震灾害的最佳方法,但它在科学上还是有缺陷的(即PSHA所基于的物理和数学是无效的)。使用PSHA可能会导致不安全或过于保守的工程设计或公共政策,每一项都会给社会带来可怕的后果。另一方面,即使DSHA被标记为不可靠,DSHA也是评估地震危险性的可行方法。 DSHA的最大缺点是通常会忽略时间特征(即地震发生的频率和相关的不确定性)。另一种选择是地震危险性分析(SHA),直接利用地震科学和统计数据,并提供地震危险性估计值,可以很容易地用于地震危险性评估和其他应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号