...
【24h】

In response

机译:作为回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of our manuscript was to present an alternate hypothesis on large-scale climatic controls on epidemic cholera. Within this context data from Indus River Valley and Haiti were used to show that episodes of warm air temperature, followed by high rainfall may contribute to cholera occurrence. It appears that Gaudart and colleagues are not interpreting our results correctly.1 We did not challenge the idea of importation, but rather disagree on the timing of such an event. Climate can play a role in a primary cholera outbreak. Spread of the disease within a population is a secondary route of transmission. Regarding references in our manuscript, we have'provided all necessary and appropriate references within the context of our results and interpretations (such as Chin and others, 2011).We now present evidence, indicating our disagreement with the interpretation by Gaudart and colleagues.
机译:我们手稿的目的是提出关于霍乱流行的大规模气候控制的另一种假设。在这种情况下,来自印度河流域和海地的数据被用来表明,气温升高和随后的高降雨可能导致霍乱的发生。看来Gaudart和同事们没有正确地解释我们的结果。1我们并未质疑进口的想法,而是对此类事件的发生时间持不同意见。气候可能在霍乱的主要爆发中起作用。该疾病在人群中的传播是第二种传播途径。关于手稿中的参考文献,我们已经在我们的结果和解释的背景下提供了所有必要和适当的参考文献(例如Chin等人,2011)。我们现在提出证据,表明我们不同意高迪特及其同事的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号