Authors' reply!

Mary Cannon; lan Kelleher; Jack A. Jenner

首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of psychiatry : >Authors' reply!

【24h】

Authors' reply!

机译：作者的回复！

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

We thank readers for their interest in our editorial. The main purposes of the editorial were threefold: (i) to highlight the relatively recent identification and characterisation of a non-clinical psychosis population (for review see Kelleher & Cannon); (ii) to point out that there might be important overlap in the genetics of the clinical and non-clinical psychosis phenotypes; and (iii) to discuss the potential value of this population for empirically testing evolutionary theories of psychosis.

机译：感谢读者对我们社论的关注。社论的主要目的是三方面的：（i）强调非临床精神病人群的相对较近的识别和特征（综述见Kelleher＆Cannon）; （ii）指出临床和非临床精神病表型的遗传学可能存在重要的重叠; （iii）讨论该人群在经验上检验精神病进化论的潜在价值。

著录项

来源
《The British journal of psychiatry :》 |2011年第1期|共1页
作者
Mary Cannon; lan Kelleher; Jack A. Jenner;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类精神病学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Reply from Authors re: Adri C. Voogd, Rob HA Verhoeven. Treatment of the Primary Tumour in the Presence of Metastases: Lessons from Breast Cancer. Eur Urol 2016;69:797-9 Reply from Authors re: Alfred I. Neugut, Edward P. Gelmann. Treatment of the Prostate in the Presence of Metastases: Lessons from Other Solid Tumors. Eur Urol 2016;69:795-6 The Time Is Ripe to Test the Hypothesis that Radical Prostatectomy Improves Survival in Men with Distant Metastatic Prostate Cancer [J] . Sooriakumaran Prasanna, Graefen Markus, Wiklund Peter European urology . 2016,第5期

机译：作者的回复：Adri C. Voogd，Rob HA Verhoeven。有转移灶的原发肿瘤的治疗：乳腺癌的经验教训。 Eur Urol 2016; 69：797-9作者的回覆：Alfred I. Neugut，Edward P. Gelmann。存在转移时前列腺的治疗：其他实体瘤的经验教训。 Eur Urol 2016; 69：795-6现在是测试假说前列腺癌根治术可改善远处前列腺癌患者生存率的时机
2. Reply from authors re: Alexandre Mottrie, Marco Borghesi, Vincenzo Ficarra. Is traditional laparoscopy the real competitor of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy? Eur Urol 2012;62:1034-6 and Reply from authors re: Anthony T. Corcoran, Alexander Kutikov, Robert G. Uzzo. Meaningful comparison of robotics versus laparoscopy for nephron-sparing surgery: No contest or no dice? Eur Urol 2012;62:1037-8 [J] . AboumarzoukO.M., KaoukJ.H., EyraudR., European urology . 2012,第6期

机译：作者的回覆：Alexandre Mottrie，Marco Borghesi，Vincenzo Ficarra。传统的腹腔镜检查是否是机器人辅助部分肾切除术的真正竞争对手？ Eur Urol 2012; 62：1034-6和作者的回复：Anthony T. Corcoran，Alexander Kutikov，Robert G. Uzzo。机器人和腹腔镜在保肾手术中的有意义的比较：没有比赛或没有骰子？ Eur Urol 2012; 62：1037-8
3. Author’s 2nd reply to comments on author’s reply to “Review of the thermodynamic basis for models of delayed hydride cracking rate in zirconium alloys,” M.P. Puls in J. Nucl. Mater. 393 (2009) 350–367 [J] . Young S. Kim Journal of Nuclear Materials: Materials Aspects of Fission and Fusion . 2010,第2a3期

机译：作者对“对锆合金中延迟氢化物裂解速率模型的热力学基础的综述”的评论的第二条评论。 J. Nucl中的脉冲。母校393（2009）350–367
4. Overview of PAN 2018 Author Identification, Author Profiling, and Author Obfuscation [C] . Efstathios Stamatatos, Francisco Rangel, Michael Tschuggnall, International conference of the CLEF Association . 2018

机译：PAN 2018作者标识，作者分析和作者混淆概述
5. Robustness and Games with Linear Best Replies: Theory and Applications [D] . Marku, Keler. 2019

机译：具有线性最佳回复的鲁棒性和游戏：理论和应用
6. Reply to: Comments on the authors’ reply to the critical appraisal concerning Wearable cardioverter defibrillators for the prevention of sudden cardiac arrest: a health technology assessment and patient focus group study [O] . Sabine Ettinger, Michal Stanak, Piotr Szymański, 2019

机译：回复：作者对可穿戴式心脏复律除颤器用于预防突发性心脏骤停：健康技术评估和患者焦点小组研究的关键评估的评论
7. Reply to the reply of the authors of the review article entitled “Management of status epilepticus in adults. Position paper of the Italian League against Epilepsy” [O] . Giuseppe Capovilla, Robert Nistico, Armando Magrelli 2020

机译：回复题为“在成人身份癫痫患者的癫痫患者的管理”文章的答覆答复。意大利联盟对抗癫痫的定位纸“

Authors' reply!

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅