首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of psychiatry : >The classification of psychosis
【24h】

The classification of psychosis

机译:精神病的分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Lawrie et al's editorial on the 'continuum of psychosis' is timely and welcome.1 I see this debate two ways: as a doctor needing order to help ease suffering, I agree that it is better, for the time being, to keep existing diagnostic categories of psychiatric disorder, however imperfect they may be. As a patient, I of course want care, but I also want to be understood. Many psychiatrists now consider that too much of life is branded 'disorder': in this, none of us diminishes the reality of suffering, but we do look for better ways of explaining it. Certain scientists may hate this - but people's lives do have narrative. I think we underestimate humankind if we say that we cannot accept symptom-based descriptions of suffering. I hope I am not wrong to suggest that most of the treatments used today to improve mental health are not disease specific, but rather act on either mood, thought or both.
机译:Lawrie等人关于“精神病的连续性”的社论是及时和受欢迎的。1我看到这种辩论有两种方式:作为需要秩序以减轻痛苦的医生,我同意暂时保留现有诊断会更好精神疾病的类别,但可能不完善。作为患者,我当然希望得到护理,但我也希望得到理解。现在,许多精神科医生认为,太多的生活被冠以“疾病”的烙印:在这种情况下,我们谁都不能减轻痛苦的现实,但是我们确实在寻找更好的方式来解释痛苦。某些科学家可能对此表示讨厌-但人们的生活确实具有叙述性。如果我们说我们不能接受基于症状的痛苦描述,我认为我们低估了人类。我希望我没有错地建议,当今用于改善心理健康的大多数治疗方法并非特定于疾病,而是针对情绪,思想或两者兼而有之。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号