...
【24h】

Authors' reply

机译:作者的回信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dr Fusar-Poli identified a number of studies reporting follow-up transition rates, which is not the same as predictive the validity of the tests or criteria. Most, if not all, of the studies he identified did not have information on predictive attributes of the tests or criteria, such as sensitivity and specificity. However, they had useful information on transition rates. From these it is impossible to know how good the tests/criteria were in ruling in or out the risk of developing schizophrenia from prodromal symptoms, since these studies were not systematically following up those who tested negative to the test.
机译:Fusar-Poli博士确定了许多报告随访转换率的研究,这与预测测试或标准的有效性不同。他确定的大多数(如果不是全部)研究都没有有关测试或标准的预测属性的信息,例如敏感性和特异性。但是,他们掌握了有关过渡率的有用信息。从这些信息中,我们不可能知道测试/标准在判定前驱症状发展为精神分裂症的风险方面有多好,因为这些研究并未系统地追踪那些对测试阴性的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号