首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Economic Studies >Technology Shocks and Job Flows
【24h】

Technology Shocks and Job Flows

机译:技术冲击和工作流程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We consider a version of the Solow growth model where technological progress can be investment specific or investment neutral. The labour market is subject to search frictions, and the existing productive units may fail to adopt the most recent technological advances. Technological progress can lead to the destruction of technologically obsolete jobs and cause unemployment. We calibrate the model to replicate the high persistence that characterizes the dynamics of firms' neutral technology and the frequency of firms' capital adjustment. We find that neutral technological advances increase job destruction and job reallocation and reduce aggregate employment. Investment-specific technological advances reduce job destruction, have mild effects on job creation, and are expansionary. Hence, neutral technological progress prompts Schumpeterian creative destruction, while investment-specific technological progress operates essentially as in the standard neoclassical growth model. Using structural VAR models, we provide support to the key dynamic implications of the model.
机译:我们考虑Solow增长模型的一种版本,其中技术进步可以是投资特定的或投资中立的。劳动力市场受到搜寻摩擦的影响,现有的生产单位可能无法采用最新的技术进步。技术进步会导致技术过时的工作受到破坏并导致失业。我们对模型进行校准,以复制高持久性,高持久性是企业中立技术动态变化和企业资本调整频率的特征。我们发现中性的技术进步会增加工作破坏和工作分配,并减少总就业。特定于投资的技术进步可减少工作机会的破坏,对创造就业机会有轻微的影响,并且具有扩展性。因此,中立的技术进步促使熊彼特式的创造力遭到破坏,而投资特定的技术进步则基本上像标准的新古典增长模型那样运作。使用结构化VAR模型,我们为模型的关键动态含义提供了支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号