...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal for research in mathematics education >Life in the fast lane: Blinding in the digital age (Review)
【24h】

Life in the fast lane: Blinding in the digital age (Review)

机译：快车道上的生活：数字时代的盲目性（回顾）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The November 2013 issue of JRME marks the end to the 44th volume. Looking back on the history of the journal, many things have changed since the first issue was published in January 1970. In particular, the process through which manuscripts are submitted, reviewed, and published has changed greatly. Gone are the days of mailed manuscripts and reviews. As the journal has matured with the field of mathematics education, the standards and expectations for both manuscripts and reviews have also evolved. These standards and expectations are to a great extent influenced by the peer-review process and are thereby linked to the practice of blinding. When submitting a manuscript to JRME, authors must submit both a blinded and an unblinded version. The blinded version is sent to reviewers, and the unblinded version is used by the editorial staff. Although other journals use a single-blind process (reviewers are aware of the identities of the authors) or an open review process (both parties are aware of the others’ identities), the JRME review process remains a double-blind process in which neither authors nor reviewers are aware of the others’ identities.
机译：2013年11月发行的JRME标志着第44卷的结束。回顾该期刊的历史，自1970年1月第一期出版以来，许多事情发生了变化。特别是，稿件的提交，审阅和出版过程发生了很大变化。邮寄手稿和评论的日子已经一去不复返了。随着该杂志在数学教育领域的成熟，手稿和评论的标准和期望也不断发展。这些标准和期望在很大程度上受到同行评审过程的影响，因此与盲目实践联系在一起。向JRME提交稿件时，作者必须同时提交盲版和非盲版。盲版发送给审稿人，非盲版由编辑人员使用。尽管其他期刊使用单盲过程（审稿人知道作者的身份）或公开审阅过程（双方都知道其他作者的身份），但是JRME审阅过程仍然是双盲过程，其中既没有作者或审稿人都知道其他人的身份。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号