Your views and letters

Rick Wallace

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of advanced nursing >Your views and letters

【24h】

Your views and letters

机译：您的意见和来信

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The enlightened article by Pugh (2009) describes the transitional journey a nurse must face after having been reported to a Nurse Regulatory Authority (NRA) Pugh describes the process of being reported to an NRA as one similar to experiencing an extremely traumatic event. He even equates one participant likening the process to a woman being assaulted and not telling anyone about it. This article focused on the nurse rebuilding his or her personal self, not necessarily the nature or the outcome of the unprofessional conduct being reported, except to the extent that he listed the classification of the violation and only in one case reported the patient outcome, which in that case resulted in patient death.

机译：Pugh（2009）的开篇文章描述了护士向护士监管局（NRA）报告后必须面对的过渡旅程Pugh描述了向NRA报告的过程与经历严重创伤事件相似。他甚至将一个参与者比喻成一个被殴打的女人，并且没有告诉任何人这个过程。本文的重点是护士重建他或她的个人自我，不一定要报告所报告的非专业行为的性质或结果，除非他列出了违规的分类，并且只有一例报告了患者的结果，在那种情况下导致患者死亡。

著录项

来源
《Journal of advanced nursing》 |2010年第1期|共2页
作者
Rick Wallace;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类护理学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Letter to the Editor Improving systematic reviews on psychometric properties of measurement instruments: A letter to the Editor commenting on Reilly et al.'s (2015) review of the psychometric literature on QIDS [J] . Joan Trujols, Javier Ballesteros, Ivan Sola, Journal of psychiatric research . 2015,第Null期

机译：致编辑的信改善对测量仪器的心理计量学特性的系统评价：致编辑的信评论Reilly等人（2015年）对QIDS的心理计量学文献的评论
2. Answer to the Letter to the Editor of F. M. Kovacs et al. entitled "overviews should meet the methodological standards of systematic reviews" concerning "the evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews" by Wilco C.H. Jacobs et al.; Eur Spine J, doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2823-4 [J] . JacobsW.C.H., RubinsteinS.M., WillemsP.C., European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society . 2014,第2期

机译：回答致意案的编辑。Kovacs等人。题为“概述应符合系统性评论的方法论标准”关于“低背障碍的手术干预措施的证据，威尔科C.H.的系统性评论概述” 雅各布等人。 EUR SPINE J，DOI：10.1007 / S00586-013-2823-4
3. Forward-viewing endoscope or side-viewing duodenoscope for ERCP in patients after Billroth II gastrectomy? (letter; comment) [J] . Mosca S, Uomo G, Ascione A Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique . 1998,第1期

机译：Billroth II胃切除术后患者的ERCP正视内窥镜或十二指肠镜（字母;评论）
4. Review on Liaoning Daily Open Letter from Critical Thinking Viewpoint [C] . Haowen FENG, Weimin OUYANG International Conference on Social Science, Education Management and Sports Education . 2015

机译：从批判性思维观点辽宁日常公开信
5. Letters to a dictionary: Competing views of language in the reception of 'Webster's Third New International Dictionary' [D] . Bello, Anne Pence 2013

机译：给字典的信：接受“韦伯斯特第三本新国际字典”时对语言的看法
6. Answer to the Letter to the Editor of F. M. Kovacs et al. entitled Overviews should meet the methodological standards of systematic reviews concerning The evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders an overview of systematic reviews by Wilco C.H. Jacobs et al.; Eur Spine J doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2823-4 [O] . Wilco C. H. Jacobs, Sidney M. Rubinstein, Paul C. Willems, 2014

机译：F. M. Kovacs等人给编辑的信的答复。 Wilco C.H.撰写的题为综述应符合系统评价的方法学标准涉及下腰部疾病的外科手术证据系统评价的概述。 Jacobs等。 Eur Spine Jdoi：10.1007 / s00586-013-2823-4
7. British Letters Patent of 1908 and 1917 constituting the Falkland Islands Dependencies The following are the texts of the two Letters Patent denning the boundaries of the Falkland Islands Dependencies. They are reprinted here in view of the current political interest in this area. Some confusion has arisen owing to misrepresentation of the wording of these documents. The Letters Patent of 1908 made provision for the government of certain specified land areas lying between specified latitudes and longitudes. No claim was made to jurisdiction over the High Seas within these boundaries; still less was any claim made to that part of South America which lies to the south of latitude 50° S. The Letters Patent of 1917 denned the area more precisely in order to avoid this ambiguity. All subsequent British legislation for the administration of these Dependencies is based on the authority of these two documents. [O] . 1948

机译：英国信件1908年和1917年构成福克兰群岛的依赖性以下是谴责福克兰群岛依赖性的边界的两封信的文本。鉴于目前对该领域的政治兴趣，他们在此转载。由于这些文件的措辞歪曲了一些混乱。 1908年的信件专利为某些指定土地区域的政府提供了符合特定纬度和纵向的政府。在这些界限内没有索赔对公海的司法管辖区;仍然仍然是对南美洲的那部分索利的任何索赔，这些南美侧向纬度为50°S南部。1917年的字母专利更准确地击落了该地区，以避免这种歧义。所有后续英国人的管理这些依赖项的立法是基于这两份文件的权威。

Your views and letters

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅