• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of forensic sciences. >Alcohol-induced blackout as a criminal defense or mitigating factor: An evidence-based review and admissibility as scientific evidence
【24h】

Alcohol-induced blackout as a criminal defense or mitigating factor: An evidence-based review and admissibility as scientific evidence

机译：酒精引起的停电是刑事辩护或缓解因素：基于证据的审查和可接纳性作为科学证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Alcohol-related amnesia-alcohol blackout-is a common claim of criminal defendants. The generally held belief is that during an alcohol blackout, other cognitive functioning is severely impaired or absent. The presentation of alcohol blackout as scientific evidence in court requires that the science meets legal reliability standards (Frye, FRE702/Daubert). To determine whether "alcohol blackout" meets these standards, an evidence-based analysis of published scientific studies was conducted. A total of 26 empirical studies were identified including nine in which an alcohol blackout was induced and directly observed. No objective or scientific method to verify the presence of an alcoholic blackout while it is occurring or to confirm its presence retrospectively was identified. Only short-term memory is impaired and other cognitive functions-planning, attention, and social skills-are not impaired. Alcoholic blackouts would not appear to meet standards for scientific evidence and should not be admissible.
机译：与酒精有关的健忘症-酒精中断-是刑事被告人的常见主张。通常认为，在酒精停电期间，其他认知功能会严重受损或不存在。在法庭上将酒精停电作为科学证据的陈述要求该科学符合法律可靠性标准（Frye，FRE702 / Daubert）。为了确定“酒精停电”是否符合这些标准，对发表的科学研究进行了基于证据的分析。总共确定了26个经验研究，其中包括9个引起酒精停电并直接观察到的研究。没有客观或科学的方法可以验证酒精中毒的发生或追溯确认酒精中毒的存在。仅短期记忆受损，而其他认知功能（计划，注意力和社交技能）未受损。酒精性停电似乎不符合科学证据的标准，因此不应被接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号