...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neuroscience, psychology, and economics >The Neuroeconomics of Voting: Neural Evidence of Different Sources of Utility in Voting
【24h】

The Neuroeconomics of Voting: Neural Evidence of Different Sources of Utility in Voting

机译：投票的神经经济学：投票中各种效用来源的神经证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Which motives drive the decision of a voter to approve or reject a policy proposal? The Public Choice literature distinguishes between instrumental and expressive voting motives. We investigated the importance of these motives by analyzing the patterns of neural activity in different voting situations. We conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment that investigates neural activation at the moment of voting and used the altruism scale proposed by Tankersley, Stowe, and Huettell (2007) to differentiate between altruists and nonaltruists. Nonaltruists showed neural activation patterns that were consistent with expressive voting motives. Among nonaltruists, we also observed activation patterns that point at egoistic instrumental motives. Both results are in line with the corresponding Public Choice literature. On the other hand, we found no evidence for expressive voting motives among altruists. Their neural activation pattern was generally much less conclusive with respect to the underlying motives.
机译：哪些动机驱动投票人决定批准或拒绝政策建议？公共选择文献区分了工具性和表达性投票动机。我们通过分析不同投票情况下神经活动的模式来研究这些动机的重要性。我们进行了功能磁共振成像实验，研究投票时的神经激活，并使用了Tankersley，Stowe和Huettell（2007）提出的利他主义量表来区分利他主义者和非利他主义者。非利他主义者表现出与表达投票动机一致的神经激活模式。在非利他主义者中，我们还观察到了指向利己主义工具动机的激活模式。两项结果均与相应的公共选择文献一致。另一方面，我们没有发现利他主义者表现出投票动机的证据。就其潜在动机而言，它们的神经激活模式通常不那么确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号