...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology >Advanced Practitioners Are Not Mid-Level Providers
【24h】

Advanced Practitioners Are Not Mid-Level Providers

机译:高级从业者不是中级提供者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I was puzzled. Was the term "mid-level" a way of quantifying the amount of care the NPs and PAs provided? Was it a way of qualifying the type of care they provided? I felt confused and belittled. I was in the midst of graduate level (advanced) education and as such would be practicing at an advanced level of nursing. The scope of practice within my home state allowed me to practice medicine under the supervision of a collaborating physician. I was dismayed at the term "mid-level" and what it must sound like to a patient, a family member, or another health-care professional. I did not seek employment at that practice upon graduation.
机译:我很困惑。 “中级”一词是否可以量化NP和PA提供的护理数量?这是一种限定他们提供的护理类型的方法吗?我感到困惑和贬低。我当时处于研究生阶段(高级)教育中,因此将在高级护理水平上进行练习。我在家乡的执业范围使我能够在合作医师的监督下进行医学治疗。我对“中级”一词及其对患者,家庭成员或其他医疗保健专业人员的听起来感到沮丧。毕业后,我没有找到那份工作的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号