...
【24h】

Type I: Families, planning and errors

机译:第一类:家庭,计划和错误

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Scientists frequently want to answer the question ‘has this treatmenthad an effect?’ Most are unaware that the tests they usuallyuse do not directly address this question. These tests usually posea different question, based on the possibility that nothing hashappened. The question becomes: ‘how probable are these data,if there were NO difference between the original populationsfrom which the data have been randomly drawn?’ (In fact formost laboratory experiments, this supposition is patently false –the experiment has been conducted using a pre-ordained sample,possibly randomly divided into treatment and control groups, butcertainly not randomly sampled.)
机译:科学家经常想回答“这种治疗方法有效果吗?”的问题。大多数人都不知道他们通常使用的检测方法不能直接解决这个问题。这些测试通常会根据没有发生哈希的可能性提出不同的问题。问题变成:“如果随机抽取数据的原始种群之间没有差异,这些数据的可能性有多大?”(事实上,对于大多数实验室实验来说,这种假设显然是错误的–实验是使用预先-规定的样本,可能随机分为治疗组和对照组,但肯定不是随机样本。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号