...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Current Science: A Fortnightly Journal of Research >Funds for grant applicants
【24h】

Funds for grant applicants

机译：赠款申请者的资金

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

I am certain that many readers agree with the points that Gowrishankar 1 has raised in his well-argued letter on the roles of experts and finance officials in deciding the amount and composition of funds to be allotted to grant applicants. The fact that he had to resort to the RTI route (twice) in order to get details on a research grant is saddening in itself. More troublesome is the fact that the finance people overrule the subject experts in deciding what equipment the applicant is allowed to acquire for his research and what amount for laboratory consumables. In the instant case, the poor applicant had to agree to the reduced budget (asked for Rs 78 lakhs, finally offered Rs 25 lakhs, no to the desired equipment), ‘akin to obtaining consent at gunpoint’ (as Gowrishankar puts it eloquently).
机译：我相信，许多读者都同意Gowrishankar 1在其饱受争议的信中提出的观点，即关于专家和财务官员在决定分配给申请人的资金的数量和组成方面的作用。为了获得研究补助金的详细信息，他不得不诉诸RTI路线（两次）的事实本身令人感到难过。更麻烦的是，财务人员在决定允许申请人购买用于研究的设备以及实验室消耗品的数量时，否决了主题专家。在当前情况下，贫穷的申请人不得不同意减少的预算（要价780万卢比，最后出价250万卢比，对所需设备没有出价），“想在枪口下获得同意”（正如Gowrishankar雄辩地表示） 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号