...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>AACE International Transactions >The Great Debate: Is CPM Past Its Prime?
【24h】

The Great Debate: Is CPM Past Its Prime?

机译：大争论：每千次展示费用是否过了顶峰？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

For more than 50 years, CPM scheduling has been expanding in the engineering and construction industry, becoming the dominant scheduling technique for complex projects. However, as the technique has spread, criticism of its application has followed. Ten years ago, some of the most experienced CPM practitioners could not see the logic in many CPM schedules and advocated a return to fundamentals. Other experts have designed enhancements and variations on existing CPM techniques; while others have dismissed CPM as cumbersome and advocated other scheduling techniques for better collaboration, transparency, and ease of use. Will CPM be the dominant planning and scheduling technique of the next 50 years, or will it be displaced? Will the use of agile, critical chain, GPM, or lean techniques come to dominate? The audience must decide whether they believe the quality of CPM schedules will improve or decrease, and whether CPM will continue to dominate or be overtaken by another method.
机译：50多年来，CPM调度在工程和建筑行业中一直在扩展，已成为复杂项目的主要调度技术。但是，随着该技术的普及，对其应用的批评也随之而来。十年前，一些经验最丰富的CPM从业者看不到许多CPM时间表中的逻辑，因此主张回归基本面。其他专家对现有的CPM技术进行了改进和改进;其他人则认为CPM繁琐，并提倡使用其他调度技术来提高协作性，透明度和易用性。 CPM是未来50年的主要计划和调度技术，还是会被取代？敏捷，关键链，GPM或精益技术的使用是否会占主导地位？听众必须决定他们是否相信CPM计划的质量会提高还是下降，以及CPM是继续主导还是被其他方法超越。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号