• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências >Citizen science participation in research in the environmental sciences: key factors related to projects' success and longevity
【24h】

Citizen science participation in research in the environmental sciences: key factors related to projects' success and longevity

机译：公民科学参与环境科学研究：与项目成功与长寿相关的关键因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The potential impacts of citizen science initiatives are increasing across the globe, albeit in an imbalanced manner. In general, there is a strong element of trial and error in most projects, and the comparison of best practices and project structure between different initiatives remains difficult. In Brazil, the participation of volunteers in environmental research is limited. Identifying the factors related to citizen science projects' success and longevity within a global perspective can contribute for consolidating such practices in the country. In this study, we explore past and present projects, including a case study in Brazil, to identify the spatial and temporal trends of citizen science programs as well as their best practices and challenges. We performed a bibliographic search using Google Scholar and considered results from 2005-2014. Although these results are subjective due to the Google Scholar's algorithm and ranking criteria, we highlighted factors to compare projects across geographical and disciplinary areas and identified key matches between project proponents and participants, project goals and local priorities, participant profiles and engagement, scientific methods and funding. This approach is a useful starting point for future citizen science projects, allowing for a systematic analysis of potential inconsistencies and shortcomings in this emerging field.
机译：公民科学倡议的潜在影响在全球越来越多，虽然以不平衡的方式。一般来说，大多数项目中有一个强大的试验和错误的元素，以及不同举措之间最佳实践和项目结构的比较仍然困难。在巴西，志愿者在环境研究中的参与是有限的。在全球范围内确定与公民科学项目的成功和长寿有关的因素可以有助于巩固该国的这种做法。在这项研究中，我们探索过去和目前的项目，包括在巴西在内的案例研究，以确定公民科学计划的空间和时间趋势以及他们的最佳实践和挑战。我们使用谷歌学者进行了书目搜索，并考虑了2005 - 2014年的结果。虽然这些结果是由于Google Scholar的算法和排名标准，但我们强调了在地理和纪律领域进行比较项目的因素，并确定了项目支持者和参与者之间的关键匹配，项目目标和地方优先事项，参与者简介和参与，科学方法和参与资金。这种方法是未来公民科学项目的有用起点，允许对该新兴领域的潜在不一致和缺点进行系统分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号