首页> 外文期刊>The Psychologist >Psychological expert evidence and the Parole Board
【24h】

Psychological expert evidence and the Parole Board

机译:心理专家证据和假释板

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We write in response to the recent publicity surrounding the case of Mr Radford (Worboys), and the Judicial Review. The case raises many complex social and legal issues, but here we want to focus on the question of psychological professionalism and expertise. Rather unusually, psychologists (including the two of us) were in the spotlight, with three psychological risk assessments cited, one of these being instructed and signed off by the prison, and a psychology member on the Panel. The public outcry at the Parole Board decision led to questions being raised about the integrity and competence of the psychologists in their expert role, most particularly in arriving at an apparently irrational conclusion in what is an understandably emotive case.
机译:我们为迎接围绕Radford先生(Worboys)的案件以及司法审查的围绕宣传。 案件提高了许多复杂的社会和法律问题,但在这里我们希望专注于心理专业职业主义和专业知识的问题。 相当异常,心理学家(包括我们两个人)在聚光灯中,引用了三个心理风险评估,其中一个被监狱指示和签署了小组的心理成员。 假释委员会决定的公众屈服导致了对心理学家在其专家角色的诚信和能力的提出的问题,最特别是在一个明显的非理性结论中达到了明显的情绪化的情况。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Psychologist》 |2018年第5期|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号