...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural History >Small farms, cash crops, agrarian ideals, and international development.
【24h】

Small farms, cash crops, agrarian ideals, and international development.

机译：小型农场，经济作物，理想农业和国际发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This address is an exploration of a lifetime of disparate and often conflicting observations about how different people view what is right and good for agriculture, food, and farmers around the world. The exploration utilizes the concept of wicked problems to focus on the issue of differing historical interpretations of global agricultural development. Sandra Batie defines wicked problems as "dynamically complex, ill-structured, public problems" for which "there can be radically different views and understanding of the problem by different stakeholders, with no unique 'correct' view." The wicked problem construct is applied to four core ideas in the history of agricultural development -- small farms, cash crops, agrarian ideals, and international development -- to demonstrate the potential for using this concept to approach complex problems of historical interpretation and contribute to solutions to the challenges of global agricultural development. The author suggests historians should acknowledge contradictory interpretations adn work toward reconciliation and synthesis, where it is possible and, where not, toward a clear explication of the basis for remaining differences. The author also encourages historians to seek multidisciplinary research opportunities that will help bring insights about historical context to policy deliberations.
机译：这个演讲是对一生中不同的人如何看待世界各地的农业，粮食和农民的正确和有益观点的一生的探索。探索利用邪恶问题的概念来关注全球农业发展的不同历史解释问题。桑德拉·巴蒂（Sandra Batie）将邪恶的问题定义为“动态复杂，结构不良的公共问题”，对于这些问题，“不同的利益相关者可能会有截然不同的观点和对问题的理解，而没有独特的'正确'观点。”邪恶的问题构造适用于农业发展历史上的四个核心思想，即小农场，经济作物，农业理想和国际发展，以展示使用此概念解决历史解释的复杂问题并为之做出贡献的潜力。解决全球农业发展挑战的方法。作者建议历史学家应承认矛盾的解释，并在可能的情况下致力于和解与综合工作，而在没有可能的情况下，则为明确说明剩余差异的基础做出了努力。作者还鼓励历史学家寻求多学科的研究机会，这将有助于将有关历史背景的见解带入政策审议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号