首页> 外文期刊>Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. >A comparison of three vulnerability models for the onset of substance use in a high-risk sample.
【24h】

A comparison of three vulnerability models for the onset of substance use in a high-risk sample.

机译:三种脆弱性模型对高风险样本中的三种脆弱性模型的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the following three vulnerability models for early-onset substance use in a high-risk sample: the deviance proneness model, the negative affect regulation model, and a comprehensive model including both delinquency and negative affect. METHOD: The sample included 249 15- to 19-year-old adolescents (57% children of alcoholics) and their fathers, all of whom were seen at follow-up 5 years later. At both times of measurement, participants completed a clinical psychiatric interview and a battery of self-report questionnaires assessing temperament, negative affect, delinquency, and substance use. RESULTS: Although all of the models fit the data well, the deviance proneness model was parsimonious and provided the best fit. Delinquency played a significant mediating role, whereas negative affect did not. Moreover, negative affect and delinquency were not significantly related to one another. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that the deviance proneness model may be a more useful theoretical framework than the negative affect regulation model or a comprehensive model when examining the onset of substance use, particularly in a high-risk sample.
机译:目的:该前瞻性研究的目的是将以下三种脆弱性模型进行高风险样本:衰弱的倾向模型,负面影响规则模型以及包括犯罪和负面影响的综合模型。方法:样品包括249名15至19岁的青少年(57%的酗酒者)及其父亲,所有这些都在5年后看到的。在衡量时间,参与者完成了临床精神教试和一箱自我报告调查问卷,评估了气质,负面影响,违法和物质使用。结果:虽然所有模型都适合数据良好,但偏差典型模型是显着的,并提供最适合的。犯罪效果显着调解角色,而负面影响没有。此外,负面影响和违法者并没有彼此显着相关。结论:本研究的结果表明,当检查物质使用的发作时,偏差倾向模型可能是比负面影响调节模型或综合模型更有用的理论框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号