...
【24h】

Reply

机译:回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dr Gupta et al rightly point out that screening for and treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) ideally serves 2 purposes: (1) short-term maternal and perinatal outcome and (2) long-term outcome. In their letter they concentrate on long-term maternal outcome: identification of minor degrees of glucose intolerance during pregnancy, using strict glucose threshold values, may identify an additional group of women destined to develop type-2 diabetes later in life. This is especially important in a country like India, with a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes occurring rather early in life. We agree with their reasoning. However, when using very strict criteria, many of these women will unnecessarily be labeled and stigmatized as being at high risk for later diabetes.
机译:Gupta博士等正确地指出,筛查和治疗妊娠糖尿病(GDM)理想地具有两个目的:(1)孕产妇和围产期的短期结局和(2)长期结局。在他们的信中,他们专注于长期的孕产妇结局:使用严格的葡萄糖阈值来确定怀孕期间轻微的葡萄糖耐受不良程度,可能会识别出另一批注定在晚年发展为2型糖尿病的女性。在像印度这样的国家中,这尤其重要,因为2型糖尿病的患病率很高,而且生命还很早。我们同意他们的推理。但是,当使用非常严格的标准时,这些妇女中的许多人将不必要地被贴上标签,并被贴上耻辱的标签,表示以后患糖尿病的风险很高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号