...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >Push, blow or both: is there a role for compression-only CPR?
【24h】

Push, blow or both: is there a role for compression-only CPR?

机译：推，打击或两者：是否存在仅限压缩CPR的作用？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A recent meta-analysis of 79 studies involving 142 740 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac aetiology documented a survival-to-hospital discharge rate of 7.6% (95% CI 6.7-8.4) [1]. This analysis showed that survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has changed little over the last 30 years, although a few recent studies report improving survival rates [2, 3]. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases the chances of long-term survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [1, 4] but bystander CPR rates are low: in England in 2004-2006 the bystander CPR rate was 36% (unpublished data, National Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Project), which is consistent with the 32% documented in the recent international meta-analysis [1], Reasons for bystanders' not attempting CPR include: no previous training [5]; panic; concern about causing harm; and unwillingness to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation (rescue breathing) [6].
机译：None

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号