• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Irrigation Science >Irrigation and fertilization management to optimize rice yield, water productivity and nitrogen recovery efficiency
【24h】

Irrigation and fertilization management to optimize rice yield, water productivity and nitrogen recovery efficiency

机译：灌溉与施肥管理优化水稻产量，水生产率和氮恢复效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Increasing water scarcity and environmental contamination with excess chemical nitrogen fertilizer use necessitate the development of water-nitrogen conservation technology in rice production. Therefore, a 2-year field experiment (2017-2018) was conducted with three water regimes, namely (1) continuous flooding irrigation, CF; (2) safe alternate wetting and drying irrigation, AWD(safe); and (3) severe alternate wetting and drying irrigation, AWD(severe), and four nitrogen application (N-app) rates, namely 0 (N-0), 90 (N-1), 180 (N-2), and 270 (N-3) kg N ha(-1), to determine the effects of water regimes and N(app)rates on rice yield, total water productivity (WPi+r) and nitrogen recovery efficiency (NRE). The results demonstrated that the water regime, N(app)rate and their interaction showed significant effects on rice yield, WP(i+r)and NRE and similar variations were observed in 2017 and 2018. The rice grain yield and WPi+r(or the water productivity of irrigation, WPi) significantly increased from N(0)to N(2)treatments but varied little between N(2)and N(3)treatments. The rice yield under AWD(safe)was higher than that under AWD(severe), whereas their WP(i+r)and WP(i)values showed the opposite trends. The WP(i)values in 2018 were substantially higher than those in 2017 due to the lower irrigation amount in 2018. The highest rice NRE occurred with the combination of N(2)with the CF and AWD(safe)conditions, and it was significantly higher than that under AWD(severe). The dualistic and quadric regression equations of water and N(app)rate showed that rice yield, WP(i+r)and NRE could not be maximized simultaneously. Based on the maximum likelihood method, it was demonstrated that maintaining the water quantity and N(app)rate at 11,000 m(3) ha(-1)and 160 kg N ha(-1)can serve as a suitable strategy to achieve maximal comprehensive benefits for rice grain yield, WP(i+r)and NRE in certain regions with water shortage. The optimization model can save approximately 17.0% of water input and 11.1% of N(app)rate, respectively, compared to the traditional strategy. However, further research should validate and adapt these technologies in larger-scale fields.
机译：None

著录项

  • 来源
    《Irrigation Science》 |2021年第2期|共15页
  • 作者

    Cao Xiao-chuang; Wu Long-long; Lu Ruo-hui; Zhu Lian-feng; Zhang Jun-hua; Jin Qian-yu;

  • 作者单位

    China Natl Rice Res Inst State Key Lab Rice Biol 359 Tiyuchang Rd Hangzhou 310006 Zhejiang Peoples R China;

    China Natl Rice Res Inst State Key Lab Rice Biol 359 Tiyuchang Rd Hangzhou 310006 Zhejiang Peoples R China;

    Zhejiang Cultivated Land Qual &

    Fertilizer Adm St Hangzhou 310020 Peoples R China;

    China Natl Rice Res Inst State Key Lab Rice Biol 359 Tiyuchang Rd Hangzhou 310006 Zhejiang Peoples R China;

    China Natl Rice Res Inst State Key Lab Rice Biol 359 Tiyuchang Rd Hangzhou 310006 Zhejiang Peoples R China;

    China Natl Rice Res Inst State Key Lab Rice Biol 359 Tiyuchang Rd Hangzhou 310006 Zhejiang Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农业科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号