Antigone Betrayed? The European Court of Human Rights' Decisions on Conscientious Objection to Abortion in the Cases of Grlmmark v. Sweden and Steen v. Sweden

Irene Domenici

首页> 外文期刊>European journal of health law >Antigone Betrayed? The European Court of Human Rights' Decisions on Conscientious Objection to Abortion in the Cases of Grlmmark v. Sweden and Steen v. Sweden

【24h】

Antigone Betrayed? The European Court of Human Rights' Decisions on Conscientious Objection to Abortion in the Cases of Grlmmark v. Sweden and Steen v. Sweden

机译：止回剂被背叛了？欧洲人权法院关于GRLMMark诉案件中堕胎的脱钙作品的决定。瑞典和斯丁诉瑞典

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The article deals with the recent decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in the cases of two Swedish midwives who claimed a right to conscientious objection to abortion under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (echr). After giving an overview of the relevant previous case-law of the Court, I argue that the decisions of inadmissibility in the midwives' cases are a step backwards in the promising evolution of the Court's jurisprudence that began with the judgments in the cases of Eweida and others v. the United Kingdom and Bayatyan v. Armenia. In particular, the Court's reasoning in Grimmark v. Sweden and Steen v. Sweden failed to take into consideration the existence of a European consensus and the fact that less restrictive alternatives could have reasonably accommodated the conscientious claims of the two applicants.

机译：None

著录项

来源
《European journal of health law》 |2021年第1期|共22页
作者
Irene Domenici;
展开▼
作者单位

Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy Munich Germany;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类 R89;
关键词
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR); conscientious objection; abortion; Sweden; Article 9 European Convention on Human Rights (echr); reasonable accommodation;

机译：欧洲人权法院（ECTHR）;尽责的异议;堕胎;瑞典;第九条欧洲人权公约（ECHR）;合理的住宿;

相似文献

外文文献

1. A Balance Between Court Security and Fair Trials:Court Cages in Criminal Cases——Using European Court of Human Rights Cases for Reference [J] . LI Chongtao, YIN Tao 人权：英文版 . 2019,第002期
2. Rethinking the Method and Function of Proportionality Test in the European Court of Human Rights [J] . FAN Jizeng 人权：英文版 . 2016,第001期
3. PRIVATE LIFE AND THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION, INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: ALEX SPRINGER AG V. GERMANY AND VON HANNOVER V. GERMANY (NO. 2) [J] . PROFESSOR DR. GUIDO WESTKAMP International Legal Materials . 2012,第4期

机译：私人生活和鉴赏保证金，欧洲人权法庭的介绍性说明：ALEX SPRINGER AG诉德国和VON HANNOVER诉德国（第2号）
4. INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (GC): AL-JEDDA V. UNITED KINGDOM AND AL-SKEINI & OTHERS V. UNITED KINGDOM [J] . ALKA PRADHAN International Legal Materials . 2011,第6期

机译：欧洲人权法院简介：AL-JEDDA诉联合王国，AL-SKEINI及其他人诉V.联合王国
5. EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: GILLAN & QUINTON V. UNITED KINGDOM - DECISION REGARDING STOP AND SEARCH POWERS UNDER U.K. ANTI-TERRORISM LEGISLATION [J] . FIONA DONSON International Legal Materials . 2010,第2期

机译：欧洲人权法院：GILLAN＆QUINTON V.联合王国-关于英国反恐怖主义立法中的制止和寻求权力的决定
6. Paragraph-level Rationale Extraction through Regularization: A case study on European Court of Human Rights Cases [C] . Ilias Chalkidis, Manos Fergadiotis, Dimitrios Tsarapatsanis, Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies . 2021

机译：正规化的段级理由提取 - 欧洲人权案例案例研究
7. Compounded Discrimination and the Gonzalez v. Mexico Case: Introducing an Anti-Essentialist Framework for Compounded Discrimination/Violence against Women Cases at the Inter-American Court of Human Rights [D] . Spratt, Beth Allison 2011

机译：复合歧视与Gonzalez诉墨西哥案：在美洲人权法院引入反必要主义框架，以实现针对妇女的复合歧视/暴力案件
8. Abortion and conscientious objection: rethinking conflicting rights in the Mexican context [O] . Gustavo Ortiz-Millán 2018

机译：堕胎和出于良心拒服兵役：在墨西哥背景下重新考虑权利冲突
9. European Court of Human Rights: Diamant Salihu and others v. Sweden [O] . Voorhoof Dirk 2016

机译：欧洲人权法院：Diamant salihu和其他人诉瑞典
10. United States Policy on Detainees Captured During the Global War on Terror in Light of the United States Supreme Court Decisions in Rasul v. Bush, Rumsfeld v. Padilla, and Hamdi v. Rumsfeld [R] . Brockington, G. J. 2005

机译：Rassul诉布什，拉姆斯菲尔德诉帕迪拉和哈姆迪诉拉姆斯菲尔德的最高法院裁决

Antigone Betrayed? The European Court of Human Rights' Decisions on Conscientious Objection to Abortion in the Cases of Grlmmark v. Sweden and Steen v. Sweden

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅