• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative health research >Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research
【24h】

Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research

机译：审查我们所知道的信息如何了解它：一种基于团队的反复性模型，可用于快速定性健康研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Reflexivity constitutes a core component of qualitative research and has been actively integrated into long-term and “lone ranger” approaches to qualitative research. However, its application to team-based approaches and particularly to rapid qualitative team-based approaches continues to lag behind. In this article, we introduce a reflexivity model we developed for teams undertaking rapid qualitative studies. Utilizing our most recent application of this model to a rapid qualitative appraisal of health care workers’ experiences delivering care during the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study, we identify the steps to put this model into practice and its main outcomes. Our application of the model revealed that the team’s practices could be grouped along four dimensions: design assumptions, data collection and analysis processes, multidisciplinary collaboration, and responsible dissemination. Reflexivity can improve the relations within the team and the quality of the research output, if it is implemented as a continuous and iterative process.
机译：自反性是定性研究的核心组成部分，并已被积极纳入定性研究的长期和“独行侠”方法中。然而，它在基于团队的方法中的应用，尤其是在基于团队的快速定性方法中的应用仍然落后。在这篇文章中，我们将介绍我们为进行快速定性研究的团队开发的自反性模型。利用我们最近的2019冠状病毒疾病模型的最新应用，对医疗工作者在COVID-19流行期间的护理经验进行快速定性评价，我们确定了将该模型付诸实践的步骤及其主要结果。我们对该模型的应用表明，团队的实践可以按照四个维度进行分组：设计假设、数据收集和分析过程、多学科协作和负责任的传播。自反性可以改善团队内部的关系和研究成果的质量，如果它作为一个连续的迭代过程来实施的话。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号