• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The American psychologist >The Evolution of Work Team Research Since Hawthorne
【24h】

The Evolution of Work Team Research Since Hawthorne

机译：霍桑以来工作团队研究的演变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Since the Hawthorne studies of the 1920s and 1930s, there has been tremendous progress in the science and the practice of work group effectiveness. We chronicle the evolution of 3 schools of thought concerning work groups that spawned about the time of those studies. We highlight the different emphases of each perspective and how they eventually merged into an integrated view of teamwork. We also illustrate the disciplinary ebbs and flows of work group research over the past quarter century and how many different scholars from diverse institutions are currently contributing to the literature. We highlight the progress that has been made both in terms of scholarly insights and practical advances. We argue that the popular Input-Process-Outcome framework has facilitated progress in the field but has also become a limiting factor. We conclude that future advances will be associated with: (a) the advent of new theories, methodologies, and tools for modeling dynamic team properties; (b) a greater appreciation for, and sophisticated conceptions of, team task environments; and (c) conceptions of teams as entities in multilevel environments.
机译：自20世纪二三十年代霍桑研究以来，工作组有效性的科学和实践取得了巨大的进步。我们记录了三个关于工作组的思想流派的演变，这些工作组是在这些研究的时间产生的。我们强调每个视角的不同侧重点，以及它们最终如何融入团队合作的整体视角。我们还说明了过去四分之一个世纪工作组研究的学科起伏，以及来自不同机构的不同学者目前对该文献的贡献。我们强调在学术见解和实践进展方面取得的进展。我们认为，流行的输入-过程-结果框架促进了该领域的进展，但也成为了一个限制因素。我们得出结论，未来的进步将与：（a）建模动态团队属性的新理论、方法和工具的出现；（b） 对团队任务环境有更高的认识和更复杂的概念；（c）团队作为多层次环境中的实体的概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号