...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy. >Should Pharmacists Be Allowed to Conscientiously Object to Medicines Supply on the Basis of Their Personal Beliefs?
【24h】

Should Pharmacists Be Allowed to Conscientiously Object to Medicines Supply on the Basis of Their Personal Beliefs?

机译：如果药剂师应该在他们的个人信仰的基础上认真对抗药品供应吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

THE "PRO" SIDE: For decades, conscientious objection has been a topic of intense debate within the sphere of professional health care, including pharmacy. Like physicians, pharmacists are bound by the same ancient yet fundamental Hippocratic principle-dictum primum non nocere ("first do no harm")-which at times may be juxtaposed with another important ethical principle, that of respecting patient autonomy (i.e. , respect for patient dignity, self-determination, and privacy).1 The contention between these 2 major ethical principles creates what is known as an "ethical dilemma", a situation where 2 correct principles pull in opposite directions. When a health care professional objects to the wishes of a patient to avoid causing "harm" (whether for personal, spiritual, or professional reasons), this is recognized as the professional exercising his or her right to "conscientious objection." Conscientious objection may be apparent in, though is not limited to, complex situations such as abortion, contraception, and physician-assisted suicide.
机译：“亲”方面：几十年来，良心拒服兵役一直是包括药剂学在内的专业医疗领域内激烈辩论的话题。与医生一样，药剂师也受同一古老但基本的希波克拉底原则的约束，即“第一不伤害”——这一原则有时可能与另一项重要的伦理原则并列，尊重患者自主性（即尊重患者尊严、自决和隐私）。1这两项主要伦理原则之间的争论造成了所谓的“伦理困境”，即两项正确的原则相互对立的情况。当医疗保健专业人员反对患者避免造成“伤害”（无论是出于个人、精神或职业原因）的意愿时，这被视为行使其“依良心拒服兵役”权利的专业人员尽管不限于堕胎、避孕和医生协助自杀等复杂情况，良心拒服兵役可能是显而易见的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号