• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of drug policy >Ontological journeys: The lifeworld of opium across the Afghan-Iranian border in/out of the pharmacy
【24h】

Ontological journeys: The lifeworld of opium across the Afghan-Iranian border in/out of the pharmacy

机译：本体论旅程：阿富汗 - 伊朗边境的鸦片的救生羊，进出药房

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

How can we conceive alternative policy models that embrace the empirical potentialities emerging from the life-world of drugs? The article reflects on this question, concluding that to reassess and to reinvent current policies on drugs, we need to think with a political ontology. Incidentally, the article also responds to the critique dismissing ontological inquiries as obstructing ? or, at best, not informing ? alternative drug policies. In an archaeological approach inspired by the work of Giorgio Agamben, the article unearths the case study of opium maintenance programme in Iran (1969?79), a forgotten policy experiment in an understudied and yet crucial geo-cultural en-vironment for the global study of drugs. Mobilising the conceptual framework of ontological journeys, the article recomposes the lifeworld of opium within the horizons of transformative cultural practices, international borders, policy regimes and public ethics. Here, the materiality of drug consumption under the maintenance policy links with the changes in opium?s transnational political economy and with shifting regimes of health and bioethical orthodoxy. Ontological journeys, hence, develop in a fluid space and time, making it possible to illuminate the lifeworld of drugs in places and times hitherto deserted by global policy studies. In building theoretical reflec-tions upon a non-Western case, the article also incites the possibility of theory beyond Eurocentric knowledge and Euromerican cases. In this way, the article?s purpose is to analyse the be-coming of opium beyond ?good? or ?evil?, as a ?medicine? or a ?drug? and its real or perceived classification as ?licit? or ?illicit? across the Afghan-Iranian border. In conclusion, the article reflects upon the significance of this forgotten policy experiment, understood as an ontological journey, for contemporary drug policy and drug studies, but also for reinventing notions of care, welfare and health.
机译：我们怎样才能构想出替代性的政策模型，以包含药物生活世界中出现的经验潜力？这篇文章对这个问题进行了反思，得出结论认为，要重新评估和重塑当前的毒品政策，我们需要用政治本体论来思考。顺便说一句，这篇文章也回应了批评，认为本体论的研究是阻碍？或者，充其量，不通知？替代药物政策。这篇文章以乔治·阿甘本（Giorgio Agamben）的工作为灵感，采用考古学的方法，挖掘了伊朗鸦片维持计划（1969-79）的案例研究，这是一个被遗忘的政策实验，在一个尚未得到充分研究但对全球毒品研究至关重要的地理文化环境中进行。本文调动了本体论旅程的概念框架，在变革性文化实践、国际边界、政策制度和公共伦理的视野中重新构建了鸦片的生活世界。在这里，维持政策下药物消费的重要性与鸦片的变化有关吗？中国的跨国政治经济以及健康和生物伦理正统观念的转变。因此，本体论之旅是在一个流动的空间和时间中发展的，这使得我们有可能在迄今为止被全球政策研究抛弃的地方和时代，阐明药物的生命世界。在对一个非西方案例进行理论反思的过程中，本文还提出了超越欧洲中心主义知识和欧美案例的理论可能性。这样，文章呢？s的目的是分析鸦片的未来？好的或恶毒的作为一个？医学还是一个？毒品它真正的或被认为的分类是什么？合法吗？或非法的越过阿富汗和伊朗边境。最后，本文反思了这一被遗忘的政策实验的意义，它被理解为一次本体论之旅，对当代药物政策和药物研究，以及对医疗、福利和健康观念的重塑都具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号