• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of drug policy >'Clean athlete status' cannot be certified: Calling for caution, evidence and transparency in 'alternative' anti-doping systems
【24h】

'Clean athlete status' cannot be certified: Calling for caution, evidence and transparency in 'alternative' anti-doping systems

机译：'干净的运动员状态'无法认证：致电“替代”反兴奋剂系统中的谨慎，证据和透明度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Athletes, sponsors and sport organisations all have a vested interest in upholding the values of clean sport. Despite the considerable and concerted efforts of the global anti-doping system over two decades, the present system is imperfect. Capitalising upon consequent frustrations of athletes, event organisers and sponsors, alternative antidoping systems have emerged outside the global regulatory framework. The operating principles of these systems raise several concerns, notably including accountability, legitimacy and fairness to athletes. In this paper, we scrutinise the Clean Protocol TM , which is the most comprehensive alternative system, for its shortcomings through detailed analysis of its alleged logical and scientific merits. Specifically, we draw the attention of the anti-doping community-including researchers and practitioners-to the potential pitfalls of using assessment tools beyond the scope for which they have been validated, and implementing new approaches without validation. Further, we argue that whilst protecting clean sport is critically important to all stakeholders, protocols that put athletes in disadvantageous positions and/or pose risks to their professional and personal lives lack legitimacy. We criticise the use of anti-doping data and scientific research out of context, and highlight unintended harms that are likely to arise from the widespread implementation of such protocols in parallel with-or in place of-the existing global anti-doping framework.
机译：运动员、赞助商和体育组织都有维护清洁体育价值观的既得利益。尽管全球反兴奋剂体系在过去20年中做出了相当大的一致努力，但目前的体系并不完善。利用运动员、赛事组织者和赞助商因此遭受的挫折，在全球监管框架之外出现了其他反兴奋剂系统。这些制度的运作原则引发了一些担忧，尤其是对运动员的问责性、合法性和公平性。在本文中，我们通过对其所谓的逻辑和科学价值的详细分析，审视了最全面的替代系统《清洁协议TM》的缺点。具体而言，我们提请包括研究人员和从业者在内的反兴奋剂界注意，使用评估工具超出已验证范围，并在未经验证的情况下实施新方法可能存在的陷阱。此外，我们认为，虽然保护清洁体育对所有利益相关者至关重要，但将运动员置于不利地位和/或对其职业和个人生活构成风险的协议缺乏合法性。我们批评断章取义地使用反兴奋剂数据和科学研究，并强调与现有全球反兴奋剂框架并行或替代现有全球反兴奋剂框架广泛实施此类协议可能产生的意外伤害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号