• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie >Revisiting 'Bordering, Ordering and Othering': An Invitation to 'Migrate' Towards A Politics of Hope
【24h】

Revisiting 'Bordering, Ordering and Othering': An Invitation to 'Migrate' Towards A Politics of Hope

机译：重新审视“边界，订购和以除”：邀请“迁移”对希望的政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

'Bordering, Ordering and Othering' is a landmark in the scholarship of the 'processual turn' in border studies. This commentary provides some reflections on van Houtum and van Naerssen's paper that seek to foster not only an appreciation of the research avenues it has opened but also a critical interrogation of its shortcomings. Rethinking borders as processes has significantly contributed to the conceptual evolution of borders. And yet, I am concerned with how the b/ordering-othering perspective can be questioned and broadened. In so doing, I conclude by taking up van Houtum and van Naerssen's invitation to problematise the border, questioning certainty and securities provided by the exclusive modern state-centric way of thinking borders based on fixed and everlasting binary framing, which blind us to the constant state of becoming of political and social order. It's an invitation to 'migrate' towards an alternative politics of hope.
机译：“边界、顺序和其他”是边界研究中“过程转向”学术的里程碑。这篇评论对范·霍图姆和范·内尔森的论文进行了一些反思，这些论文不仅试图培养人们对其所开辟的研究途径的欣赏，还试图对其不足之处进行批判性的质疑。将边界作为过程进行重新思考极大地促进了边界概念的演变。然而，我关心的是b/其他视角如何被质疑和拓宽。在这样做的过程中，我最后接受了范·霍图姆和范·纳尔森提出的边界问题化的邀请，质疑基于固定和永恒的二元框架的以国家为中心的排他性现代思维方式所提供的确定性和安全性，这种思维方式使我们看不到政治和社会秩序不断形成的状态。这是向另一种希望政治“迁移”的邀请。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号