...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >Assessing and Interpreting Interaction Effects: A Reply to Vancouver, Carlson, Dhanani, and Colton (2021)
【24h】

Assessing and Interpreting Interaction Effects: A Reply to Vancouver, Carlson, Dhanani, and Colton (2021)

机译：评估和解释互动效应：对温哥华，卡尔森，达那内和冒号（2021年）的回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Van Iddekinge et al. (2018)'smeta-analysis revealed that ability and motivation havemostly an additive rather than an interactive effect on performance. One of the methods they used to assess the ability x motivation interaction was moderated multiple regression (MMR). Vancouver et al. (2021) presented conceptual arguments that ability and motivation should interact to predict performance, as well as analytical and empirical arguments against the use of MMR to assess interaction effects. We describe problems with these arguments and show conceptually and empirically that MMR (and the Delta R and Delta R-2 it yields) is an appropriate and effective method for assessing both the statistical significance and magnitude of interaction effects. Nevertheless, we also applied the alternative approach Vancouver et al. recommended to test for interactions to primary data sets (k = 69) from Van Iddekinge et al. These new results showed that the ability x motivation interaction was not significant in 90% of the analyses, which corroborated Van Iddekinge et al.'s original conclusion that the interaction rarely increments the prediction of performance beyond the additive effects of ability and motivation. In short, Van Iddekinge et al.'s conclusions remain unchanged and, given the conceptual and empirical problems we identified, we cannot endorse Vancouver et al.'s recommendation to change how researchers test interactions. We conclude by offering suggestions for how to assess and interpret interactions in future research.
机译：Van Iddekinge等人（2018年）的smeta分析表明，能力和动机对绩效的影响主要是一种相加作用，而不是交互作用。他们用来评估能力与动机互动的方法之一是缓和多元回归（MMR）。温哥华等人（2021年）提出了能力和动机应该相互作用以预测绩效的概念性论点，以及反对使用MMR评估互动效应的分析和实证论点。我们描述了这些论点的问题，并从概念上和经验上表明，MMR（以及它产生的δR和δR-2）是评估相互作用效应的统计显著性和大小的一种适当而有效的方法。然而，我们也采用了温哥华等人推荐的替代方法，对Van Iddekinge等人的原始数据集（k=69）进行交互测试。这些新结果表明，90%的分析中，能力x动机交互作用不显著，这证实了VanIddekinge等人的原始结论，即除了能力和动机的加性效应外，这种相互作用很少增加对绩效的预测。简言之，Van Iddekinge等人的结论保持不变，鉴于我们发现的概念和经验问题，我们不能支持温哥华等人改变研究人员测试互动方式的建议。最后，我们为未来研究中如何评估和解释互动提供建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号