...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiac surgery. >Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:阀门内传动管主动脉瓣更换与重做外科主动脉瓣更换:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Aim With the growing contemporary use of bioprosthetic valves, whose limited long-term durability has been well-documented, an increase in the need for reintervention is expected. We perform a meta-analysis to compare the current standard of care, redo surgical aortic valve replacement (Redo SAVR) with the less invasive alternative, valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV TAVR) for treating structural valve deterioration.
机译:背景/目的随着现代生物瓣膜的使用越来越多,其有限的长期耐久性已得到充分证明,预计再干预的需求将增加。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,比较目前治疗结构性瓣膜恶化的标准治疗方法,即重做外科主动脉瓣置换术(redo SAVR)和微创替代方法,即经导管主动脉瓣置换术(ViV TAVR)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号