...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : >Ethical Research Practice or Undue Influence? Symbolic Power in Community- and Individual-Level Informed Consent Processes in Community-Based Participatory Research in Swaziland
【24h】

Ethical Research Practice or Undue Influence? Symbolic Power in Community- and Individual-Level Informed Consent Processes in Community-Based Participatory Research in Swaziland

机译：道德研究实践或过度影响？ 斯威士兰社区参与性研究中社区和个人级知情同意过程中的象征权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In community-based participatory research (CBPR), community-level consent is assumed to enhance ethical rigor, when obtained prior to individual informed consent. However, community leaders' permission to conduct research may influence individuals' agency to decline participation. This article presents findings of a Bourdieusian analysis of ethnographic data documenting CBPR in rural Swaziland. The findings reveal that the symbolic power of leaders who provide community-level consent constrains individual agency and reproduces existing relations of power, if individual informed consent is simply a procedure. However, when informed consent is a process that introduces notions of autonomy and rights, it can disrupt power relations. Implications for ethical CBPR practice, and ethnography's value for developing theory from real-world research ethics practice, are discussed.
机译：在以社区为基础的参与性研究（CBPR）中，当在个人知情同意之前获得社区层面的同意时，假设社区层面的同意可以提高伦理严谨性。然而，社区领导人允许进行研究可能会影响个人机构拒绝参与。本文介绍了布尔迪厄斯人对斯威士兰农村记录CBPR的人种学数据的分析结果。研究结果表明，如果个人知情同意仅仅是一种程序，那么提供社区层面同意的领导者的象征性权力会约束个人代理，并复制现有的权力关系。然而，当知情同意是一个引入自治和权利概念的过程时，它可能会破坏权力关系。讨论了伦理CBPR实践的含义，以及人种学对从现实世界的研究伦理实践中发展理论的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号