...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hand Surgery. American Volume >Accuracy of Injection Into the First Dorsal Compartment:?A Cadaveric Ultrasound Study
【24h】

Accuracy of Injection Into the First Dorsal Compartment:?A Cadaveric Ultrasound Study

机译:注射精度进入第一个背舱:?一个尸体超声研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposeTo determine the accuracy of ultrasound-guided (UG) injections compared with anatomic landmark–guided (AL) injections in the first dorsal compartment (FDC) with the hypothesis that ultrasound guidance would increase the accuracy of injection. MethodsWe randomized 43 above-elbow cadaveric specimens to receive latex dye injections into the FDC via a UG or AL technique. If ultrasound imaging identified a septated FDC, the needle was redirected and a portion of the dye was injected around the extensor pollicis brevis (EPB) tendon. Specimens were dissected and data collected regarding the location of the dye and presence of a septated FDC. Fisher exact test was used to calculate the difference in accuracy rates of injections. ResultsAll 21 specimens injected via UG and all 22 specimens injected via the AL technique demonstrated dye within the FDC. Eight of 21 specimens in the UG group and 6 of 22 specimens in the AL group demonstrated a septated FDC upon dissection. Ultrasound was able to identify 6 of 8 specimens accurately with a septated FDC, representing a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 92%. Six of 8 specimens with a septated FDC in the UG group versus 2 of 6 specimens with a septated FDC in the AL group demonstrated dye infiltration around the EPB. Dye was noted in the subcutaneous tissues in 2 of 21 specimens in the UG group versus 2 of 22 specimens in the AL group. ConclusionsThe UG- and AL-based injections both had excellent dye infiltration into a portion of the FDC. Ultrasound-guided injections had a higher observed infiltration rate in EPB subcompartments than the AL technique, but could not be statistically confirmed to be different. Clinical relevanceUltrasound is unlikely to increase the accuracy of injections into an unseptated FDC. It may aid in injection of a septated FDC; however, that remains to be statistically demonstrated.
机译:目的比较超声引导(UG)注射与解剖标志引导(AL)注射在第一背室(FDC)的准确性,并假设超声引导可提高注射的准确性。方法随机抽取43例肘关节以上尸体标本,通过UG或AL技术将乳胶染料注入FDC。如果超声成像发现有分隔的FDC,则将针头重新定向,并在拇短伸肌(EPB)肌腱周围注射一部分染料。解剖标本,收集有关染料位置和存在分隔FDC的数据。Fisher精确检验用于计算注射准确率的差异。结果经UG注射的21例标本和经AL技术注射的22例标本均显示FDC内有染料。UG组21例标本中的8例和AL组22例标本中的6例在解剖时显示有分隔的FDC。超声能够准确识别8个有间隔的FDC标本中的6个,代表着75%的敏感性和92%的特异性。UG组8例FDC分隔标本中有6例显示EPB周围有染料浸润,而AL组6例FDC分隔标本中有2例显示EPB周围有染料浸润。UG组21例标本中有2例皮下组织中发现染料,而AL组22例标本中有2例皮下组织中发现染料。结论UG和AL基注射剂对部分FDC均有良好的染料渗透性。超声引导下注射在EPB小班中的观察浸润率高于AL技术,但无法从统计学上证实两者不同。临床相关性超声不太可能提高未经选择的FDC注射的准确性。它可能有助于注射分隔的FDC;然而,这仍有待统计证明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号