首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physical activity & health >A Comparison of Physical Activity Levels, Sleep Disrupting Behavior, and Stress/Affective Distress as Predictors of Sleep as Indexed by Actigraphy
【24h】

A Comparison of Physical Activity Levels, Sleep Disrupting Behavior, and Stress/Affective Distress as Predictors of Sleep as Indexed by Actigraphy

机译:身体活动水平,睡眠中断行为和压力/情感困扰的比较,作为睡眠睡眠预测因子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Several behaviors have been reported to interfere with sleep in otherwise healthy adults, including low physical activity (PA) levels. However, few studies have compared low PA with the other behavioral risk factors of objective sleep impairment, despite the behavior tending to cooccur in highly stressed and affectively distressed individuals. Thus, the authors compared objective and subjective measures of PA and other potential sleep disrupting behaviors as predictors of objective sleep (sleep onset latency, actual sleep time, total sleep duration, awake time, and sleep efficacy) at baseline (T1) and 3 months later (T2). Methods: A community-derived sample of 161 people aged 18-65 years were asked about PA, other behavior (ie, night eating, electronic device use, watching television, caffeine and alcohol use), stress, affective distress (ie, anxiety, depression), and demographics including shift work and parenting young children in an online questionnaire at T1 and T2. PA and sleep were also monitored for 24 hours each at T1 and T2 using actigraphy. Results: Multiple regression analyses indicated that sleep at T1 was associated with PA (ie, total number of steps, metabolic equivalents/time, time spent travelling) after controlling mean ambient temperature and relevant demographics. At T2, longer sleep onset latency was predicted by parenting young children and night time television viewing; shorter sleep duration was predicted by female gender; and awake time and sleep efficacy were predicted by alcohol intake after controlling T1 sleep measures, demographics, and mean ambient temperature. Conclusion: The risk factors for objective sleep impairment included parenting young children and watching television at night, whereas better sleep outcomes were associated with greater engagement with PA.
机译:背景:据报道,一些行为会干扰健康成年人的睡眠,包括低体力活动(PA)水平。然而,很少有研究将低PA与客观睡眠障碍的其他行为风险因素进行比较,尽管这种行为倾向于在高度紧张和情绪困扰的个体中发生。因此,作者比较了在基线检查(T1)和3个月后(T2)时,作为客观睡眠(睡眠起始潜伏期、实际睡眠时间、总睡眠时间、清醒时间和睡眠效能)预测因子的PA客观和主观测量值以及其他潜在的睡眠干扰行为。方法:在T1和T2的在线问卷中,对161名年龄在18-65岁之间的社区样本进行了PA、其他行为(即夜间进食、使用电子设备、看电视、咖啡因和酒精)、压力、情感困扰(即焦虑、抑郁)和人口统计(包括轮班工作和养育幼儿)的调查。在T1和T2时,使用活动描记术分别监测PA和睡眠24小时。结果:多元回归分析表明,在控制平均环境温度和相关人口统计学后,T1时的睡眠与PA(即总步数、代谢当量/时间、旅行时间)相关。T2时,通过养育幼儿和夜间看电视,可以预测更长的睡眠起始潜伏期;女性的睡眠时间更短;在控制T1睡眠指标、人口统计学和平均环境温度后,通过饮酒量预测清醒时间和睡眠效率。结论:客观睡眠障碍的危险因素包括养育幼儿和晚上看电视,而更好的睡眠结果与更大程度地参与PA有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号