首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physical activity & health >Randomized Informational Intervention and Adult Park Use and Park-Based Physical Activity in Low-Income, Racially Diverse Urban Neighborhoods
【24h】

Randomized Informational Intervention and Adult Park Use and Park-Based Physical Activity in Low-Income, Racially Diverse Urban Neighborhoods

机译:随机的信息干预和成人公园使用和基于公园的低收入的身体活动,种族多样化的城市社区

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Neighborhood parks are important locations to encourage and stimulate physical activity (PA) among the urban population. This study aims to evaluate the impact of an informational intervention on adult park use and PA behaviors in 3 low-income, racially diverse urban neighborhoods in Minneapolis, MN. Method: The study employed a household-level randomized controlled trial and collected baseline and follow-up data from 171 participants. Within each neighborhood, participants were randomized to an informational intervention or to a no-intervention comparison. Intervention households received monthly, neighborhood-specific newsletters about park-based PA opportunities, park program brochures, trail maps, and activity guides. Results: The average treatment effect of the newsletter intervention was positive yet moderated by respondent age. For a 20-year-old resident, treatment was associated with 0.97 (P < .05) additional park visits and 31.24 (P < .05) additional minutes of park-based PA over a 3-day recall period. For 40-year-old respondents, these positive effects are smaller at 0.36 (P < .05) additional visits and 4.66 (P < .05) additional minutes, respectively. Conclusions: An intervention to increase awareness about park-based PA opportunities and benefits increased self-reported park visits and in-park PA among adults who lived in low-income, racially diverse neighborhoods.
机译:背景:社区公园是鼓励和刺激城市人口进行体育活动的重要场所。本研究旨在评估信息干预对明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市3个低收入、种族多样的城市社区成年人公园使用和PA行为的影响。方法:该研究采用了家庭水平的随机对照试验,并从171名参与者中收集了基线和随访数据。在每个社区,参与者被随机分为信息干预组和无干预对照组。干预家庭每月收到关于公园PA机会、公园项目手册、路线图和活动指南的特定社区通讯。结果:时事通讯干预的平均治疗效果是积极的,但受调查者年龄的影响有所缓和。对于一名20岁的居民来说,在为期3天的召回期内,治疗与0.97(P<0.05)的额外公园参观和31.24(P<0.05)的额外公园PA分钟相关。对于40岁的受访者来说,这些积极影响较小,分别为额外就诊0.36(P<0.05)分钟和额外就诊4.66(P<0.05)分钟。结论:提高对基于公园的PA机会和益处的认识的干预措施增加了生活在低收入、种族多样社区的成年人的自我报告的公园参观和公园PA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号