...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthetics and orthotics: JPO >How to Search for Orthotic Literature Using 'Brace' Term?
【24h】

How to Search for Orthotic Literature Using 'Brace' Term?

机译：如何使用“支架”术语搜索矫形器文献？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Introduction: The selection of appropriate search queries is a primary step to explore electronic databases for evidence-based practice. Preliminary searches revealed that no previous scientific study introduced a precise search query to identify prosthetic and orthotic studies in the electronic databases. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different variations of the "brace" term for identifying the relevant studies in the orthotics field. Study Design: This is a cross-sectional study. Methods: A series of electronic searches in Scopus and Web of Science was carried out using all variations of "brace" term, which were previously used in published reviews in the prosthetics and orthotics field. The yields were classified into relevant and irrelevant subject areas. The rate of the relevant subject area was used to define the specificity of the free-text literature search. To define a standard search query for the "brace" term, the specificity of yields was measured while combining them with another common keyword in the same subject area (orthosis) or limiting the yields to human studies. Results: "Brace" term was very widely used within different studies with an irrelevant subject area. Using truncation techniques with "brace" could reduce the precision of the subject area in the yields. The combination of "brace" with a synonym subject heading term increased the sensitivity of search, and refining search results through applying a filter (e.g., human studies) improved the precision of yields. Conclusions: This study indicated that using "brace" as a free-text literature search does not have enough precision to recall relevant studies in the prosthetics and orthotics field.
机译：导言：选择合适的搜索查询是探索电子数据库进行循证实践的主要步骤。初步搜索显示，之前没有任何科学研究引入精确的搜索查询来识别电子数据库中的假肢和矫形研究。目的：本研究的目的是评估“支架”术语不同变体的有效性，以确定矫形学领域的相关研究。研究设计：这是一项横断面研究。方法：在Scopus和Web of Science上进行一系列电子搜索，使用“支架”术语的所有变体，这些术语以前曾在修复和矫正学领域发表的评论中使用。产量被分为相关和不相关的主题领域。相关主题区域的比率用于定义自由文本文献搜索的特异性。为了定义“支架”术语的标准搜索查询，在将其与同一主题领域（矫形器）中的另一个常见关键字组合或将产量限制在人类研究中时，测量产量的特异性。结果：“支架”一词在不同的研究中有着广泛的应用，且涉及的主题领域不相关。使用带有“支架”的截断技术可能会降低产量中主题区域的精度。“大括号”与同义词主题词的组合提高了搜索的敏感性，并通过应用过滤器（例如人类研究）改进搜索结果，提高了结果的精确度。结论：本研究表明，使用“支架”作为自由文本文献检索，其精确度不足以回忆修复和矫形学领域的相关研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号