...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of professional nursing: official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing >Using the peer review process to educate and empower emerging nurse scholars
【24h】

Using the peer review process to educate and empower emerging nurse scholars

机译：使用对等审查流程进行教育和授权新兴护士学者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Peer review, in various forms, is fundamental to research-based fields and scholarly publication. The integrity of the publication process is necessary to advance nursing science and support clinical nursing practice. The peer review process undergirds publication and grant funding. In theory, peer review should occur in a process that is unbiased with results providing a fair assessment of the scientific merit and credibility of the work being reviewed. The purpose of peer review is lost if reviewer comments are unprofessional. Budding nurse scholars may be demoralized and discouraged to revise and resubmit their work after receiving review feedback they perceive unprofessional and lacking constructive recommendations on how to improve their work. This ?incivility? in the peer review process may discourage nursing authors from revising and resubmitting their work, thus robbing nursing of potentially meaningful contributions to nursing science. Often beginning doctorate nursing students have little or no experience in having their scholarly works evaluated and receiving feedback via the peer review process. Peer review provides an opportunity to educate emerging nurse scholars on ways to improve their writing skills and ways to receive and respond to constructive, meaningful feedback. This article aims to discuss: 1) peer review process, 2) challenges with peer review, 3) impact of unprofessional peer review comments and incivility in nursing peer review process can have on a budding scientists and nurse scholars, 4) ways the peer review process can be used to educate and empower emerging nurse scholars, 5) implications for nursing scholarship, 6) recommendations to address bias and how to provide supportive and constructive feedback and 7) finally provide readers with available resources where they can learn more about how to conduct a peer review.
机译：同行评议的形式多种多样，是研究性领域和学术出版物的基础。出版过程的完整性对于推进护理科学和支持临床护理实践是必要的。同行评审过程为出版和拨款提供了基础。从理论上讲，同行评议应该在一个不带偏见的过程中进行，其结果应该公平地评估被评议工作的科学价值和可信度。如果评审员的评论不专业，同行评审的目的就失去了。初出茅庐的护士学者可能会士气低落，在收到他们认为不专业且缺乏关于如何改进工作的建设性建议的评审反馈后，不愿意修改和重新提交他们的工作。这不文明？在同行评审过程中，可能会阻止护理作者修改和重新提交他们的工作，从而剥夺护理对护理科学潜在的有意义的贡献。通常，刚开始攻读博士学位的护理专业学生很少或根本没有通过同行评议过程对其学术作品进行评估和接受反馈的经验。同行评议提供了一个机会，教育新兴的护士学者如何提高他们的写作技能，以及如何接受和回应建设性的、有意义的反馈。本文旨在讨论：1）同行评议过程，2）同行评议面临的挑战，3）非专业同行评议评论和护理同行评议过程中的不文明行为对初露头角的科学家和护士学者的影响，4）同行评议过程可用于教育和授权新兴护士学者的方式，5）对护理学术的影响，6）解决偏见以及如何提供支持性和建设性反馈的建议，7）最终为读者提供可用的资源，让他们了解如何进行同行评议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号