• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP >Perceptions of Syringe Service Programs and Supervised Use Sites Among a Sample of Registered Voters in a US State
【24h】

Perceptions of Syringe Service Programs and Supervised Use Sites Among a Sample of Registered Voters in a US State

机译：在美国州的登记选民样本中的注射器服务计划和监督使用网站的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Context: The decision to initiate a syringe service program or expand to a supervised use site is often influenced by local public support or opposition. Objective: The purpose of this study was to better understand public attitudes to local syringe service programs to inform the possibility of expanding services. Design, Setting, and Participants: We surveyed a sample of registered voters (n = 690) in the 8 counties in the state of Colorado with existing syringe service programs. Main Outcome Measures: Respondents were asked about their awareness of and attitudes toward syringe service programs and supervised use sites. Results: More than three-fourths of respondents reported they were familiar with syringe service programs, but only a quarter knew they were legal, despite all survey respondents living near an operating program. Nearly one in 3 respondents thought a syringe service program or a supervised use site makes a community better, and a majority (57%) thought supervised use sites should be legal in their state. There were significant differences in attitudes toward the benefits and risks of syringe service programs by political party affiliation. Conclusion: Understanding the level of community knowledge and support for syringe service programs, as well as the reasons for opposition, can be helpful in addressing community concerns when seeking to initiate or expand services.
机译：背景：启动注射器服务项目或扩大到受监督使用场所的决定通常受到当地公众支持或反对的影响。目的：本研究的目的是更好地了解公众对当地注射器服务项目的态度，以告知扩大服务的可能性。设计、设置和参与者：我们调查了科罗拉多州8个县现有注射器服务项目的登记选民样本（n=690）。主要观察指标：调查对象被问及他们对注射器服务项目和监督使用场所的意识和态度。结果：超过四分之三的受访者表示他们熟悉注射器服务项目，但只有四分之一的人知道这些项目是合法的，尽管所有受访者都住在手术项目附近。近三分之一的受访者认为注射器服务项目或监督使用场所会让社区变得更好，大多数（57%）认为监督使用场所在他们所在的州应该是合法的。不同政党对注射器服务项目的益处和风险的态度存在显著差异。结论：了解社区对注射器服务项目的知识和支持水平，以及反对的原因，有助于在寻求启动或扩大服务时解决社区关注的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号