...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery >Comparison of the accuracy of telehealth examination versus clinical examination in the detection of shoulder pathology
【24h】

Comparison of the accuracy of telehealth examination versus clinical examination in the detection of shoulder pathology

机译：远程医疗检测准确性比较临床检查检测肩部病理学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Hypothesis/Background: In 2017, the American Orthopaedic Association advocated for the increased use of telehealth as an assessment and treatment platform, and demand has significantly increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Diagnostic effectiveness (also called overall diagnostic accuracy) and reliability of a telehealth clinical examination vs. a traditional shoulder clinical examination (SCE) has not been established. Our objective is to compare the diagnostic effectiveness of a telehealth shoulder examination against an SCE for rotator cuff tear (RCT), using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a reference standard; secondary objectives included assessing agreement between test platforms and validity of individualized tests. We hypothesize that tests provided in a telehealth platform would not have inferior diagnostic effectiveness to an SCE.
机译：假设/背景：2017年，美国骨科协会倡导更多地使用远程医疗作为评估和治疗平台，在2019年新冠病毒病大流行期间，需求显著增加。远程健康临床检查与传统肩部临床检查（SCE）的诊断有效性（也称为总体诊断准确性）和可靠性尚未确定。我们的目的是以磁共振成像（MRI）为参考标准，比较远程健康肩部检查和SCE对肩袖撕裂（RCT）的诊断效果；次要目标包括评估测试平台之间的一致性和个体化测试的有效性。我们假设远程医疗平台提供的检测不会比SCE的诊断效果差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号