首页> 外文期刊>Psychology of men & masculinity >Comparable or Not? Assessing Measurement Invariance of a Modified Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale Between Sexual Minority and Nonsexual Minority Men in Five Asia-Pacific Countries
【24h】

Comparable or Not? Assessing Measurement Invariance of a Modified Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale Between Sexual Minority and Nonsexual Minority Men in Five Asia-Pacific Countries

机译:是否可比? 评估五个亚太国家的性少数群体与非性少数群体之间的流行病学研究 - 抑郁量表的测量不变性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Depressive disorders are a growing public health concern in the Asia-Pacific region. Sexual minority men bear a disproportionate burden of depression compared with their nonsexual minority counterparts. Sexual minority men's exposure to interpersonal and institutional homophobic violence and discrimination may contribute to differences in depressive symptomology between the two groups. Comparing the burden of mental illness among sexual and nonsexual minority men requires that mental health measures are statistically comparable across representative samples of these groups. In the Asia-Pacific region, the comparability of depression measures is largely assumed, rather than tested. We conducted measurement invariance tests on a modified 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale using site-representative samples of sexual minority and nonsexual minority men aged 18-49 from sites in five Asia-Pacific countries. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in random split-half samples showed that a single-factor latent construct of depression has good model fit. In multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, the modified 10-item CES-D scale showed full (scalar) measurement invariance by sexuality. Thus, this unidimensional modified CES-D scale is suitable to measure and to compare depressive symptoms across sexual and nonsexual minority men in the Asia-Pacific region.
机译:抑郁症是亚太地区日益增长的公共卫生问题。与非性少数民族相比,性少数族裔男人承担着抑郁症的不成比例负担。性少数群体男性接触人际交往和机构同性恋暴力和歧视可能会导致两组之间的抑郁症状差异。比较性和非性少数族裔男性的精神疾病负担要求精神健康措施在这些群体的代表性样本中具有统计学性可比性。在亚太地区,在很大程度上假定了抑郁措施的可比性,而不是测试。我们使用五个亚太地区的地点的性少数群体和非性别少数族裔男性和非性别少数族裔男性的现场代表性样本进行了改进的10个项目流行病学研究抑制(CES-D)的测量不变性测试。在随机半分离样品中进行的探索性和验证性因素分析表明,抑郁症的单因素潜在构造具有良好的模型拟合度。在多组验证因素分析中,经过修改的10个项目CES-D量表显示了性别的完整(标量)测量不变性。因此,这种一维改良的CES-D量表适合于亚太地区的性和非性少数族裔男性中的抑郁症状进行测量和比较。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号