• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Spirituality in clinical practice. >Overlaying Buddhist and Behaviorist Lenses to Better Understand and Address Human Suffering
【24h】

Overlaying Buddhist and Behaviorist Lenses to Better Understand and Address Human Suffering

机译：覆盖佛教和行为主义镜头，以更好地理解和解决人类的痛苦

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Buddhism and radical behaviorism have distinctly different origins and were formed and practiced in unique and diverse cultures and contexts. Differences in their approaches to understanding and changing human behavior are apparent. While many Buddhist practices focus on clear understanding of the truths underlying human experience through systematic observation of internal processes, radical behaviorism has historically focused more on observation of external, objectively observable events to understand human behavior, and manipulation of external contingencies surrounding an individual to effect change. Despite these differences, however, these two perspectives and systems of understanding contain several commonalities, including emphasis on systematic observation and empirical learning, a critique of misconceptions of the "self" as separate and static, and human behavior as a function of learning history or conditioning. When overlayed, these approaches have the potential to better inform our understanding of both the causes underlying suffering, and of how to better the human experience.
机译：佛教和激进的行为主义具有明显不同的起源，并以独特和多样化的文化和背景形成和实践。他们理解和改变人类行为的方法的差异是显而易见的。尽管许多佛教实践都集中在通过系统观察内部过程的系统观察到人类经验的真理上的清晰理解，但激进的行为主义历史上更多地集中于观察外部，客观观察的事件，以了解人类的行为，并操纵围绕个人的外部意外事件，以实现影响。改变。但是，尽管存在这些差异，但这两种观点和理解系统包含了几种共同点，包括强调系统观察和经验学习，对“自我”作为独立和静态的误解的批评以及人类的行为是学习历史或学习历史的函数调理。当叠加层时，这些方法有可能更好地了解我们对两种痛苦原因的理解以及如何改善人类体验的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号